Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

From stock 5.3 to 6.3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-2014, 10:26 AM
  #21  
TECH Resident
 
gagliano7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: warwick,ny
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ferrellrooster
Test Motor #4-Mild 383 Stroker

Block: Stock (Bored to 3.902)
Crank: 4340 forged 4.0-inch stroker-Procomp Electronics
Rods: 4340 6.2-inch, Procomp Electronics
Pistons: 21cc dish forged piston, Probe Industries (3.902 bore)
Cam: COMP XR275HR .566/.568 lift split, 222/224 duration split, 112 LSA
Heads: TEA Stage 1 CNC 5.3L
Intake: Stock
TB: Accufab 78 mm
Headers: QTP 1¾-inch long-tube
Peak Power: 506 hp at 5,700 rpm
Peak Torque: 503 lb-ft at 4,700 rpm
Torque Curve: Exceeded 475 lb-ft of torque from 3,800-5,500 rpm

Though the 5.3L LM7 offers plenty of power in modified form, the torque production is ultimately limited by the displacement. The cure for this limitation is as simple as adding inches, in this case jumping from 324 ci to a full 383 ci. The increased displacement will improve not only peak power, but more importantly, average torque production. Basically the bigger motor can make more power everywhere. The additional displacement allows you to equal the power output of the wild 5.3-liter with a much milder combination. The benefit of going the stroker route is improved fuel mileage (over the wild-cammed 5.3-liter) and monster torque curve. The 5.3L block was bored to accept 3.902 forged pistons from Probe Racing, and then combined with a 4.0-inch stroker crank and 6.2-inch rods from Procomp Electronics. The stroker short-block was topped with the same TEA-ported 5.3L heads used on the mild 5.3-liter. Wanting a daily driver, we chose a mild COMP XR275HR cam. The combination offered plenty of power, peaking at 506 hp at 5,700 rpm and 503 lb-ft of torque at 4,700 rpm. Torque production was up by 100 lb-ft over the stock 5.3-liter at 3,000 rpm and by 90 lb-ft at 3,500 rpm.

Test Motor #5-Wild 383 Stroker

Block: Stock (bored to 3.9020)
Crank: 4340 forged 4.0-inch stroker, Procomp Electronics
Rods: 4340 6.2-inch, Procomp Electronics
Pistons: Flat-top forged piston, Probe Industries (3.902 bore)
Cam: COMP 289LR HR14 .624. lift, 239/242 duration split, 114 LSA
Heads: TEA Stage 2.5 LS6 (1.72 roller rockers)
Intake: LSXRT
TB: FAST 102 mm
Headers: American Racing Headers 17⁄8-inch long-tube
Peak Power: 603 hp at 6,400 rpm
Peak Torque: 544 lb-ft at 5,400 rpm
Torque Curve: Exceeded 525 lb-ft of torque from 4,400-5,900 rpm

Like the wild 5.3-liter, this 383 version pushed the limits of driveability, but boy howdy did it make power. Using a 5.3L block, we bored and stroked the 5.3-liter to achieve a final displacement of 383 ci. Unlike the mild version that featured a static compression of 9.5:1, this 383 was sporting flat-top pistons that pushed the static compression ratio to 11.0:1. The elevated compression ratio was combined with a set of TEA Stage 2.5 LS6 heads, an aggressive COMP 289LR HR14 cam and FAST LSRXT (truck) intake. Wanting to maximize power, we even installed a set of 1.72:1-ratio aluminum roller rockers and swapped out the 1¾-inch headers for larger 1⅞-inch versions from American Racing Headers. The extra breathing paid off, as the 5.3L 383ci stroker produced 603 hp and 544 lb-ft of torque. Torque production exceeded 525 lb-ft from 4,400 rpm to 5,900 rpm, making for one sweet torque curve.

So this is were I came up with the combo's and want to build the Wild and use as a DD. What do you think? I may be asking for trouble as a DD with having to have a stall and all. What do you guys think?
Here is the link to the page:
5.3L Bow Tie Builds Mild To Wild - Chevy LM7 Engines - Truckin Magazine All Pages
Go with the first version for towing and drivability.
Old 06-03-2014, 03:51 PM
  #22  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
ferrellrooster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: LA.
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by greasemykey
i built a 383 with the 2.5 heads and havent had an issue with them. i did however LOATHE the LSXRT and i want to punch the designer in the nuts. its a 1000 dollar piece of ****.
BAHAHAHAA!!!! Good God....Im crying over here man. Thats funny stuff right there. Dam...well I have head good and bad about that intake. I have my eye on a Holley Low rise intake. It has a 92mm hookup. I couldnt find one in a 102. Any other suggestions on intake with a 102? Im aways from buying it but it never hurts to shop now.
Old 06-04-2014, 08:34 AM
  #23  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
greasemykey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Portsmouth, VA
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

that wild 383 you posted is very similar to mine with a slightly larger cam and the added junk intake. i like the TBSS and edelbrock 90mm TB. however i read alot of the guys that have run the holley didnt like them unless they were force fed air. i personally have no experience with it. i know there are alot of companies that can port the **** out of the TBSS intake and so pretty well pulling more power from it.
Old 06-04-2014, 11:54 PM
  #24  
Staging Lane
 
Fast6.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: El Paso Texas
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I got the fast fuelrails and it was a bitch to install them with my injectors Justin sent his first tune it idled good for a couple of day and now i have a hard time making it idle after its hot but I have confidence in him to get it right. I also have a couple of exhaust leaks i need to fix before i log it. So far i have mixed feelings on the lsxrt i will make my decision once im done tuning im also thinking of swapping my 1 3/4 long tubes for either 2" or 1 7/8 since im planning on running a 150 200 shot of n2o
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
5.3Okasai
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
15
03-09-2022 01:07 PM
OLD BULL
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
13
08-01-2015 05:00 PM
steves86ta
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
07-28-2015 10:21 AM
Choda
MULTIMEDIA (truck related)
9
07-21-2015 03:47 PM
bk_cauley
GMT K2xx Trucks General Discussion
5
07-19-2015 09:56 PM



Quick Reply: From stock 5.3 to 6.3



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 AM.