Stroker Piston Slap Questions
#1
Thread Starter
LS1 Tech Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, Ks
Stroker Piston Slap Questions
I am planning to build a 408 iron block stroker and I am planning to use Mahle pistons (4.030" with -12 cc dish). These look to be good pistons for my daily driver, NA engine. However, they do not have offset piston pins so they will be subject to more rocking and possible piston slap during warm-up.
Does anyone have any experience with the Mahle pistons in a stroker? Are they quiet or do they have a noticeable slap during warm-up?
I could ask this same question of anyone with a stroker and 4032 alloy pistons without offset pins. Another alternative that I'm seriously considering is a set of custom Wiseco 4032 pistons with offset pins. Please share your experiences if you have a stroker. Note, I asked these same questions on LS1tech.com, but I’ve not had any takers on the questions.
Thanks,
Steve
Does anyone have any experience with the Mahle pistons in a stroker? Are they quiet or do they have a noticeable slap during warm-up?
I could ask this same question of anyone with a stroker and 4032 alloy pistons without offset pins. Another alternative that I'm seriously considering is a set of custom Wiseco 4032 pistons with offset pins. Please share your experiences if you have a stroker. Note, I asked these same questions on LS1tech.com, but I’ve not had any takers on the questions.
Thanks,
Steve
Last edited by Steve Bryant; 04-01-2006 at 12:18 AM.
#4
One of the things that concerns me about the 408 stroker engines is the amount of piston skirt that comes out the bottom of the bore. The 6.0l blocks are not a deep skirted block like the C5R blocks. With a 4.0" stroke crank there is an alarming amount of skirt that is un supported at BDC piston rock.
Richard
Richard
#5
Originally Posted by Steve Bryant
Flyer,
What about your Diamond pistons? How do they sound on initial startup and after driving for a few minutes?
Thanks,
Steve
What about your Diamond pistons? How do they sound on initial startup and after driving for a few minutes?
Thanks,
Steve
#6
Originally Posted by Richard@WCCH
One of the things that concerns me about the 408 stroker engines is the amount of piston skirt that comes out the bottom of the bore. The 6.0l blocks are not a deep skirted block like the C5R blocks. With a 4.0" stroke crank there is an alarming amount of skirt that is un supported at BDC piston rock.
Richard
Richard
Trending Topics
#9
Thread Starter
LS1 Tech Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, Ks
Flyer - Yes, the -12 cc Mahle pistons with the 1.105" Compression Height.
Richard - I agree that the skirt is coming out of the bottom of the cylinder. However, this is true on the stock pistons with the stock 3.622" stroke and the 6.098" rods. The stock pistons are taller from crown to skirt, too. If my math is correct, the wrist pin on a stroker piston with a 6.125" rod and on a 4.000" crank is .162" closer to the bottom of the cylinder than a stock wrist pin. The stroker piston's skirts have a modified design not only to clear the counter weights, but to enable more of the entirity of the piston to stay in the cylinder bore.
I wish that GM made a tall deck (like 10" +/- a couple of tenths) cast iron block for trucks. In fact, I've written them suggesting this some time back. The deck height is not a powertrain packaging issue with the trucks like it is in a car.
The World Products Warhawk block will be available in a tall deck, but it's too expensive for what I'm planning.
Steve
Richard - I agree that the skirt is coming out of the bottom of the cylinder. However, this is true on the stock pistons with the stock 3.622" stroke and the 6.098" rods. The stock pistons are taller from crown to skirt, too. If my math is correct, the wrist pin on a stroker piston with a 6.125" rod and on a 4.000" crank is .162" closer to the bottom of the cylinder than a stock wrist pin. The stroker piston's skirts have a modified design not only to clear the counter weights, but to enable more of the entirity of the piston to stay in the cylinder bore.
I wish that GM made a tall deck (like 10" +/- a couple of tenths) cast iron block for trucks. In fact, I've written them suggesting this some time back. The deck height is not a powertrain packaging issue with the trucks like it is in a car.
The World Products Warhawk block will be available in a tall deck, but it's too expensive for what I'm planning.
Steve
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
5.3lSilverado
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
25
08-29-2016 01:48 AM
superchomper2003
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
3
08-26-2015 10:39 AM