STS dyno numbers-'05 Yukon
#1
STS dyno numbers-'05 Yukon
We installed an LS6 cam and springs, Walbro 255, 43lb injectors, STS with a Gt-67, fmic, and 8psi. Numbers were better than we expected for the 5.3.
http://www.trtturbo.com/images/tx_ve...hange_dyno.jpg
Still have a little to get ironed out in the tune, but I'd say good numbers.
By the way, the truck has 24" wheels.
http://www.trtturbo.com/images/tx_ve...hange_dyno.jpg
Still have a little to get ironed out in the tune, but I'd say good numbers.
By the way, the truck has 24" wheels.
#3
Originally Posted by trtturbo
We installed an LS6 cam and springs, Walbro 255, 43lb injectors, STS with a Gt-67, fmic, and 8psi. Numbers were better than we expected for the 5.3.
http://www.trtturbo.com/images/tx_ve...hange_dyno.jpg
Still have a little to get ironed out in the tune, but I'd say good numbers.
By the way, the truck has 24" wheels.
http://www.trtturbo.com/images/tx_ve...hange_dyno.jpg
Still have a little to get ironed out in the tune, but I'd say good numbers.
By the way, the truck has 24" wheels.
I have a similar setup except 6.0 with stock cam. #'s in my sig. That's at 9ppsi, all-wheel-drive dyno, and with Methanol. You'd probably be around where I'm at if you squirt the Meth!
#4
Very nice numbers Billy!
That was dyno'd with the 24's on it?? That's some crazy HP loss right there, the weight alone would kill it let alone the mass being farther from the axle hub!
That was dyno'd with the 24's on it?? That's some crazy HP loss right there, the weight alone would kill it let alone the mass being farther from the axle hub!
#6
Originally Posted by F8L Z71
Very nice numbers Billy!
That was dyno'd with the 24's on it?? That's some crazy HP loss right there, the weight alone would kill it let alone the mass being farther from the axle hub!
That was dyno'd with the 24's on it?? That's some crazy HP loss right there, the weight alone would kill it let alone the mass being farther from the axle hub!
How much are you assuming is lost with bigger rims?
Trending Topics
#8
I think it depends on the dyno being used. Something like the DynoJet might not show as much of a difference which is another reason i think they are pieces of garbage. LOL
As for theory, it's not really. It's a proven fact in physics but how much you'd lose on a high HP car/truck I cannot say. Maybe it's negligable?
As for theory, it's not really. It's a proven fact in physics but how much you'd lose on a high HP car/truck I cannot say. Maybe it's negligable?
#9
Originally Posted by F8L Z71
I think it depends on the dyno being used. Something like the DynoJet might not show as much of a difference which is another reason i think they are pieces of garbage. LOL
#10
Yeah, I think dynos are not affected as much by wheel/tire combos, especially if there is little to no load preset. Mustang dynos seem to be the closest for theoretical HP/speed times vs real time results, but I do like the "higher" DJ numbers ;-)
The street will tell a completely different story tho, that extra weight and likely taller gearing will play havoc with your 60' times.
The street will tell a completely different story tho, that extra weight and likely taller gearing will play havoc with your 60' times.