STS Turbo vs. Modified Whipple???
#1
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Detroit
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
STS Turbo vs. Modified Whipple???
OK before I start, I know a lot of people will tell me that if I'm gonna do a S/C go with a Radix, but I've already decided I don't wanna go with a Radix.
I'm thinking about either doing a Whipple (2300AX or 3300AX) with bigger injectors and a tune from Allen or doing a basic STS Turbo setup.
The way I figure it, the price will basically be the same.
What I wanna know is the performance, maintanance, and installation comparisons. Will the STS kit cost me an arm and a leg to have installed compared to the Whipple w/ injectors?? Is the STS kit harder to maintain than the Whipple??
I've also only seen big gains from guys who have an STS kit with mods... 13#'s of boost, meth-alky injection, etc... is this the only way to see considerable gains out of these things??
Keep in mind I'm working w/ an '01 5.3 and the best I'm looking to do is a low 12 high 11... Just to make sure I can whip almost any lightning or SRT-10's *** up and down the road if I want to...
I'm thinking about either doing a Whipple (2300AX or 3300AX) with bigger injectors and a tune from Allen or doing a basic STS Turbo setup.
The way I figure it, the price will basically be the same.
What I wanna know is the performance, maintanance, and installation comparisons. Will the STS kit cost me an arm and a leg to have installed compared to the Whipple w/ injectors?? Is the STS kit harder to maintain than the Whipple??
I've also only seen big gains from guys who have an STS kit with mods... 13#'s of boost, meth-alky injection, etc... is this the only way to see considerable gains out of these things??
Keep in mind I'm working w/ an '01 5.3 and the best I'm looking to do is a low 12 high 11... Just to make sure I can whip almost any lightning or SRT-10's *** up and down the road if I want to...
#2
TECH Resident
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lone Star, Tx
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if you run a turbo. you almost gonna have to have some sort of intercooler setup. (any amount of high boost needs this) And installing an aftercooler is a heck of alot easier on a turbo vs a whipple. the way the whipple mounts leaves no room for directing flow to a intercooler. Of course you can always alky inject it, but if you want real good gains, it would be better to have a aftercooler and probably alky too. just my 2 cents. however,, i have seen my whipple hit the popoff valve at 12 to 14 pounds before. It impressed me actually!
#3
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
I am running a Whipple. but, to be honest, if a turbo or Radix kit had been available back when I bought it I would have gone a different route. The whipple compressor is probably the best out there. Only draw back is no intercooler. If my finances allowed though, I would back up and either go turbo or with a Radix. If you have the money, go with a radix kit or a good intercooled turbo setup. A non intercooled forced induction system is not as consistent with track times or horsepower levels year round as a good intercooled setup.