Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Supercharger guys..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-01-2004, 09:08 PM
  #21  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: TX
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i guess so since there so cheap.
Old 11-01-2004, 09:10 PM
  #22  
TECH Junkie
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Heard the powerdyne's suck like mentioned before compressors/bearings not any good. For me its either Radix/Vortech/Procharger w/3-core intercooler.
Old 11-01-2004, 09:32 PM
  #23  
TECH Junkie
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

With a radix would gas mileage be better than a centrifical??
Old 11-01-2004, 09:55 PM
  #24  
Baltimore Whore
iTrader: (95)
 
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

the radix is only supposed to use like 1/5 hp at 60 mph.i think some peeps picked .5 1 mpg.the centri i have no clue but i would assume it would improve.if you cold stay off the pedal
Old 11-01-2004, 10:18 PM
  #25  
TECH Junkie
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah true thats gonna be hard adding 130 rwhp though. My thing is ok they both make about the same amount of hp both make boost at different points so what is actually better for trucks:roots or centrifical??
Old 11-01-2004, 11:29 PM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
James B.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: 33.91° -117.48°
Posts: 1,984
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Installing a supercharger *NEVER* results in better fuel economy. Anyone concerned with fuel economy should not be installing a supercharger.
Old 11-01-2004, 11:38 PM
  #27  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Flyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Armpit of East TX
Posts: 9,342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BADMOFO
Sounds to me like JamesB knows his ****!

Originally Posted by James B.
Not really.
He's bluffing ...

THere have been reports of people getting as good as 20 mpg with a RADIX. Whitt for one got somewhere around that I think. I, on the other hand, don't get anything near that. I suffer from a severe case of lead foot syndrome (to many lead paint chips maybe???) and have other things that kill my gas mileage.

You're driving habits have a LOT to do with you're gas mileage.
Old 11-02-2004, 12:40 AM
  #28  
TECH Veteran
 
Mr. Sandog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sun Diego
Posts: 4,632
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Flyer
He's bluffing ...

THere have been reports of people getting as good as 20 mpg with a RADIX. Whitt for one got somewhere around that I think. I, on the other hand, don't get anything near that. I suffer from a severe case of lead foot syndrome (to many lead paint chips maybe???) and have other things that kill my gas mileage.

You're driving habits have a LOT to do with you're gas mileage.
Any increases in gas mileage from a supercharger install are a result of the tuning being different. Even a canned Superchips tune that you can't modify will be better than the stock tune. Stock tunes are notoriously inefficient (same factory tune loaded into all vehicles, in spite of every vehicle rolling off the assembly line possessing different characteristics). Even in blowers with bypass valves (a la Radix) you still have an additional component added into the belt drive system off the crank. This extra friction is not free, there is a cost associated with it.

If you want free MPG, look into a turbo, not a supercharger.
Old 11-02-2004, 08:58 AM
  #29  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Flyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Armpit of East TX
Posts: 9,342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Whitt was running the SuperChips program for the longest.
Old 11-02-2004, 09:50 AM
  #30  
12 Second Truck Club
 
Black Blown 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 1,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think JamesB is right. You shouldn't get a charger because you think it's going to improve your mileage.

I think if you are concearned about mileage, you really shouldn't have a truck anyway.


Quick Reply: Supercharger guys..



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:26 AM.