Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

supercharger vs turbo 2009 6.2L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-24-2009, 08:16 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
RXDawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default supercharger vs turbo 2009 6.2L

I'm definitely going to put some forced induction on this truck. remote turbo or supercharger. which shall it be? whipple, radix, vortech, or the turbo system? reliability is a factor to me also. I really lean to the supercharger more due to the fact of the diesel I had with it's turbo I never got used to it. i felt like i had to have a crystal ball to know when the power was about to kick in.....don't get me wrong it had power....it's just you pushed the pedal down counted to 2 or 2-1/2 and your off. I don't want another turbo if it's like that on the gas truck also.
Old 05-25-2009, 01:33 AM
  #2  
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
 
trever1t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NorCal
Posts: 26,690
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by RXDawg
I'm definitely going to put some forced induction on this truck. remote turbo or supercharger. which shall it be? whipple, radix, vortech, or the turbo system? reliability is a factor to me also. I really lean to the supercharger more due to the fact of the diesel I had with it's turbo I never got used to it. i felt like i had to have a crystal ball to know when the power was about to kick in.....don't get me wrong it had power....it's just you pushed the pedal down counted to 2 or 2-1/2 and your off. I don't want another turbo if it's like that on the gas truck also.
You are new here so we'll give you a break
The Magnuson TVS is going to give you the ultimate in reliability and instant torque.


wait, you've been here 2 years and you don't know this already
Old 05-25-2009, 01:38 AM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
pewterliftedz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

tvs or 2.6/2.8 Kenne Bell
Old 05-25-2009, 02:04 AM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 12,275
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

I vote turbo.

Turbo gives you the most potential, the most efficiency, and everyone always seems to end up with a turbo in the long run anyways. If it's sized properly there shouldn't be much lag if any.
Old 05-25-2009, 11:59 AM
  #5  
Hunt&Fisherator
iTrader: (15)
 
silver-mod-o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SETx
Posts: 14,314
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

If you want a reliable turbo setup, go with a front mount first and be done with it...
Old 05-25-2009, 08:41 PM
  #6  
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
budhayes3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hackensack, NJ
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by trever1t
The Magnuson TVS is going to give you the ultimate in reliability and instant torque.
+1 I vote Maggie also
Old 06-28-2009, 03:52 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
 
sand man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Saudi Arabia
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

TURBO OR PROCHARGER...both are better than regular blowers IMO
Old 06-28-2009, 04:17 PM
  #8  
makes children cry
iTrader: (5)
 
_zebra's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: cold & windy
Posts: 2,828
Likes: 0
Received 439 Likes on 361 Posts
Default

^^way to necro there!



if i had to get a s/c, i'd get a TVS system
personally, i'd get a turbo - not a huge one, that'll have your dreaded lag. i'd also get a front-mount, but if you want a rear-mount, i hear good things about the STS kits
Old 06-28-2009, 10:52 PM
  #9  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (6)
 
01 4.8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would go with a turbo.
Old 06-28-2009, 11:58 PM
  #10  
High on diesel fumes
iTrader: (70)
 
thunder550's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 12,658
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I've had a Radix (MP112), 76mm turbo, 82mm turbo, and now a TVS2300, and hands down the TVS is giving me the most fun I've ever had in this truck. Turbo may have a higher power potential but you have to run something big that will be laggy, and while a turbo is more efficient the new TVS blower are nipping on the heels of a turbo efficiency map. For my application, I'm looking at about 5-6% lower efficiency with the blower, which is pretty damn close.

I think a TVS1900 would do very well on your setup, or if you're looking for *****-to-the-wall power and higher boost numbers, a TVS2300. The boost and torque on this thing are absolutely instant, and no matter how small of a turbo you go with I can guarantee it won't feel like this does.


Quick Reply: supercharger vs turbo 2009 6.2L



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:41 AM.