theory about handhelds vs. tunes
01-23-2005, 05:18 PM
#33
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: C.S. TX
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by XLR8NSS
You may not have linked to a non sponsor but, posting pricing for them goes against this part of the rule.
"information that directly conflicts with paid site advertisers."
In the future please don't post pricing or any contact info for non sponsors. Saying you have a "such and such non sponsor tune and you like/dislike it" is not against the rules though.
"information that directly conflicts with paid site advertisers."
In the future please don't post pricing or any contact info for non sponsors. Saying you have a "such and such non sponsor tune and you like/dislike it" is not against the rules though.
Aaron
01-23-2005, 05:44 PM
#34
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: League City, Texas
Posts: 9,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by styleandspeed
Sounds good. I just didn't understand why it got deleted. I wasn't trying to screw our sponsors by giving the price of another, just that the thread was talking about a high cost of a tune, and was showing them that they weren't that expensive. Nelson, westers, FMS, etc aren't that expensive either, I just thought that non sponsor would be a good example.
Aaron
Aaron
Sent a PM.
01-23-2005, 08:28 PM
#35
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JFortner5
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
3
08-20-2015 06:13 PM
Castro45
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
24
07-31-2015 07:13 PM
