Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

They really need to get more results on the XT and vic jr intakes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2011, 11:05 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
SLOXCAB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 1503
Posts: 2,680
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well the vic jr power advertisment is 3500 on up so compared to the truck intake you will lose power but at the track it will benefial since the rpms are up the whole race
Old 04-03-2011, 11:12 PM
  #12  
Baltimore Whore
Thread Starter
iTrader: (95)
 
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Yah being boosted will help over being NA and losing power, my verter is 3200, but if I have to gas it more to achieve the same thing as my truck intake, I duno.. Or I might not even notice, thats why I wish there was more info available...The fukn XT's are just to much money new, esp the black one I want...
Old 04-04-2011, 12:50 AM
  #13  
Baltimore Whore
Thread Starter
iTrader: (95)
 
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tarinitup
Ive had the Vic and fast 90 on NA set up and didn't notice a huge difference. I kept the Vic for boost though.
Also what does the dyno look like for it.. I was reading some where it is limited to like 600 hp, but see them on big hp setups
Old 04-04-2011, 09:26 AM
  #14  
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (11)
 
tarinitup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Odessa Texas
Posts: 2,442
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Mangled03gmc
So you lost down low with the vic?? How is it for daily driving now, or should I say do you drive your truck every day??
I didn't feel a noticeable power loss or gain between the two intakes. Truck does awesome on the street and this is the most driver friendly set up I have ever had except for wot traction. I use my truck week nights and weekends only and burn company gas rest if time. If I could get a do-over I would use the proflow intake and get rid if Vic and elbow.
Old 04-04-2011, 02:30 PM
  #15  
Baltimore Whore
Thread Starter
iTrader: (95)
 
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Interesting.. I am strongly leaning towards the pro flow, but *** they are a ton of money IMO.. Just wish I could pull up some dyno's with boost on the vic jr, to see if it drops like it does on a NA set up
Old 04-04-2011, 02:35 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
sharpshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,539
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think I've read that the loss below 3500 was on carb set-ups, not fuel injection with the vic.

hey man their is still a lot left in your tune with your stock intake
Old 04-04-2011, 03:22 PM
  #17  
TECH Apprentice
 
RoadKill03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

my friend is using the prolfow on his truck and it works awesome. here is a run down of his setup. 402 short block 9.5:1 CR with bone stock 317's and proflow intake not ported, just the way it comes out of the box. hes running a Noribilt turbo kit and hes very consistant with a 10.30 @138 MPH with it. his truck is full weight and has a stereo system and cage. its very heavy and it moves ver well.
Old 04-04-2011, 03:50 PM
  #18  
Baltimore Whore
Thread Starter
iTrader: (95)
 
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sharpshooter
I think I've read that the loss below 3500 was on carb set-ups, not fuel injection with the vic.

hey man their is still a lot left in your tune with your stock intake
Yah no doubt, but to be honest I am getting a little bored of the truck, fig this would be a nice mod for HP and also some eye candy. Just want it to be the right one.. Yah most of the results I have come up with on the vic has been on a NA setups, either carb or with the TB style fuel injection. There isn't **** on EFI or boost app's. I would hate to do the vic, it be a total dog.. Waiting on some pricing now on a proflow from a buddy of mine..
Old 04-04-2011, 05:29 PM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
sharpshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,539
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Is heat soak an issue with these when not on a full race set up?
Old 04-04-2011, 06:02 PM
  #20  
Baltimore Whore
Thread Starter
iTrader: (95)
 
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

To be honest Russ the heat soak issue doesn't bother me really. I think it is over rated, but some will disagree.. If the IC is efficient, there should be no issue.. But honestly I have not heard any thing about it


Quick Reply: They really need to get more results on the XT and vic jr intakes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:52 AM.