Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Thorley vs OBX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-2008, 07:20 AM
  #11  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
Moddoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Forest Lake, MN
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by KevinF56
if you want to keep your low end power, go with the Thorley's. sure pacesetters, or any long tube header for that matter, give you great gains in the mid-to-high rpm, but i found you do lose some power down low. i have heard nothing but good things from people that own Thorley's.


I'll say it one more time.
Pacesetter LTs improve low rpm torque noticeably.

60K mi. on mine, still happy.
Old 10-17-2008, 08:27 AM
  #12  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
02SilveradoLT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: ND
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Living in ND, I see snow and ice six months out of the year. So I just dont know how long the pacesetters would hold up. And it seems like the OBX have fitment issues in the 4wd trucks. I've been leaning towards the Thorleys from the start but I love getting info from people with experience. Thanks guys and keep the posts coming!
Old 10-17-2008, 08:37 AM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
sonoma43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saint Joseph, MI
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Pacesetter's are the way to go unless money is no object...basically they all do the same thing...especially on a more or less stock truck. More thought should be put into something like John's setup but he's running a boosted 6.0. on a stock 5.3 it's not going to make any difference for a DD truck. Get yourself a tune and the pacesetter's for the same price as a set of stainless works or ASM lt's.
Old 10-17-2008, 10:18 AM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Gordy M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Plymouth, MI
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

When I had my 01Yukon, I put the Thorley's on it, upgraded the trans and shift points. I did that because I needed low end torque. I pulled a 7500lb enclosed trailer and it was able to keep the car in OD at 75 mph on flat and rolling highway. That was my goal and they worked very well. Today I pull the trailer with a 04 Escalade 6.0L with the same trans mods and it pulls exactly the same. The E has 50 more ft-lbs of torque but the Thorleys and a 200lb weight difference made the 5.3L pull the same. HTH
Old 10-17-2008, 10:50 AM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
KevinF56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: North of Boston
Posts: 1,726
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Moddoo

I'll say it one more time.
Pacesetter LTs improve low rpm torque noticeably.

60K mi. on mine, still happy.
really? see, i noticed a slight loss on the low end. i actually lost about a tenth and a half of a second on my 60' when i added the pacesetters, however they took off 3 tenths of my over-all quarter mile time.
Old 10-17-2008, 11:13 AM
  #16  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
Moddoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Forest Lake, MN
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Did you spin more with the LTs?

I assume westers tuned it for the headers.

It was really noticeable when I put my manifolds back on to get a TC seal done under warranty.
I drove it for about 2 weeks, and couldn't wait to get the LTs back on.
Old 10-17-2008, 02:19 PM
  #17  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
02SilveradoLT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: ND
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Living in ND I don't think the Pacesetters will last. And from what ive found on pt.net the OBX don't fit the 4wd trucks very well. Other options out there though.
Old 10-17-2008, 02:55 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
KevinF56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: North of Boston
Posts: 1,726
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Moddoo
Did you spin more with the LTs?

I assume westers tuned it for the headers.

It was really noticeable when I put my manifolds back on to get a TC seal done under warranty.
I drove it for about 2 weeks, and couldn't wait to get the LTs back on.
nope, no spinning. ran it in 4wd both times.
Old 10-17-2008, 03:36 PM
  #19  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
 
TX Tahoe Z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,836
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KevinF56
nope, no spinning. ran it in 4wd both times.
You still lose low-end with the truck tuned for LTs? I thought the tune was what made back the low-end loss?
Old 10-17-2008, 03:39 PM
  #20  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 12,275
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

I tend to believe Modoo. Several people claim loss of lowend with a cutout, but in my experience my cutout gains everywhere. I could only imagine even better exhaust flow would make better power everywhere as well


Quick Reply: Thorley vs OBX



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:52 AM.