Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Tick Performance exaggerated performance claims

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-27-2021, 01:02 AM
  #41  
100% Redneck
 
RedXray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MAGA COUNTRY
Posts: 2,098
Received 1,334 Likes on 794 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by arthursc2
Its getting late for my tired brain, but looking at the graph...
He started the same thread over at tech and with about the same replies. It was pointed out (which I missed looking at the sheet) the dyno is a Mustang and we don't know if the converter was locked. On a DynoJet with the converter locked he'd be close to the advertised gains. Add long tubes and a decent muffler it may exceed advertised.
The following 2 users liked this post by RedXray:
swathdiver (10-27-2021), zz454Chevelle67 (10-27-2021)
Old 10-27-2021, 07:44 AM
  #42  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
arthursc2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,336
Received 1,502 Likes on 1,101 Posts
Default

Was this thing previously modified?

Looking at the graph, you have a 4.8 that's not spinning up much at all and making 278 at the wheels

I have a 5.3 with a complete exhaust that was spun up (albeit with a smaller cam) and it makes 302

So you're telling me that you're unhappy when you have a smaller motor with more restriction making a mere 24hp less?

The more I think on this and look at what you've provided; I don't think there is anything missing here. Some tune clean up needs to happen for sure, but as far as hard parts go, I think she is making what she can make until you open her up some more and give her more RPM to work with. I am also wondering if the "small gains" were because this thing had a cam in it in the first place
Old 10-27-2021, 07:57 AM
  #43  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Euless, TX
Posts: 614
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MikeGyver
Why would you recommend a very similar cam that you put in a 383, for a 4.8 (292)?
212/218 on a 111 is quite a bit smaller than 218/228 on a 108 both in terms of duration and overlap. I suggested 212/218 because time and time again they have proven to work extremely well in smaller cube engines with factory intake and manifolds.
Old 10-27-2021, 08:56 AM
  #44  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
arthursc2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,336
Received 1,502 Likes on 1,101 Posts
Default

I can't say enough good things about the 212/218 .550/.550 I have in my Tahoe
Old 10-27-2021, 09:07 AM
  #45  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
MikeGyver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 4,421
Received 199 Likes on 156 Posts
Default

My mistake, I misread the specs. I thought they both were 218° and 228° duration.
Sometimes I can read 1000 words per minute, but with no comprehension.
Old 10-27-2021, 11:05 AM
  #46  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Euless, TX
Posts: 614
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by arthursc2
I can't say enough good things about the 212/218 .550/.550 I have in my Tahoe
They are great cams in heavy trucks. Don't need a ton of RPM to really come alive. I like the tighter LSAs because it helps bring the torque curve on even earlier and sounds thumpy.
Old 10-27-2021, 11:09 AM
  #47  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
arthursc2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,336
Received 1,502 Likes on 1,101 Posts
Default

Yeah Im on a 112 and my only complaint is the smell gets a little strong sometimes
Old 10-27-2021, 11:17 AM
  #48  
TECH Apprentice
 
68Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 300
Received 149 Likes on 102 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by arthursc2
Yeah Im on a 112 and my only complaint is the smell gets a little strong sometimes
Cats or no? And have you tried messing with EOIT? I've heard that can help.
Old 10-27-2021, 11:31 AM
  #49  
100% Redneck
 
RedXray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MAGA COUNTRY
Posts: 2,098
Received 1,334 Likes on 794 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by arthursc2
Yeah Im on a 112 and my only complaint is the smell gets a little strong sometimes
It's the overlap man... the more ya got the more ya stink
Old 10-27-2021, 11:37 AM
  #50  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
arthursc2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,336
Received 1,502 Likes on 1,101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 68Formula
Cats or no? And have you tried messing with EOIT? I've heard that can help.
Originally Posted by RedXray
It's the overlap man... the more ya got the more ya stink
No kitties. Overlap is great, I'd rather have the torque than smell clean. I can't smell it in the truck anyway

I have not messed with EOIT, I have mentioned it to my tuner and he has told me several times to "just bring it by" and well... no excuses, I haven't taken it by lmao. It works so well, its hard to justify changing it up


Quick Reply: Tick Performance exaggerated performance claims



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:38 AM.