Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Too much static compression?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-28-2024, 02:12 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
taaron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2024
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Too much static compression?

Hello! . I have a lq9 with the factory 317 heads. I’m putting a cam in the truck this weekend (truck Norris) valve springs, and long tube headers. The stock heads have already 2 broken exhaust manifold bolts and I thought to replace them. I was reading that 706 heads will give more low end torque which is were I’m at almost all the time. Buttttt it would put the compression ratio up to over 11 to 1! What is the limit of pump gas? I have e85 available so that could be an option. Should I keep the 317 heads and try to get the bolts out and port them? Any help is appreciated, thanks!
Old 08-28-2024, 03:35 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
wretched73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,184
Received 379 Likes on 291 Posts
Default

Are you sure your math is right?

I'd shoot for 10.5:1 but wouldn't be scared of 11:1
The following 2 users liked this post by wretched73:
68Formula (08-30-2024), infiniticrypto (09-02-2024)
Old 08-28-2024, 03:36 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
 
RB04Av's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
Received 157 Likes on 128 Posts
Default

Usual go-to for that, is 243/799 heads. Small bump in compression, not near as much as the 706/862, but usually manageable. Pretty common in the buzzard nests on mid-late 00's trucks.
Old 08-30-2024, 04:59 PM
  #4  
makes children cry
iTrader: (5)
 
_zebra's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: cold & windy
Posts: 2,808
Likes: 0
Received 432 Likes on 354 Posts
Default

don't forget that SCR is only part of the equation.

i don't remember the specs (and ain't digging them up right now), but that cam is probably increasing valve overlap a bit... and that reduces your Dynamic Compression Ratio - which affects overall cylinder pressure.

off-hand assumption is that cam'd run great with 799s, premium octane (91+), and a good tune. if i remember right, my 10.6 SCR heads + big cam + 13psi of boost make ~8.8 DCR, and i don't knock tuned for 93 & no meth (and technically usually running 91 at 3000-7000ft elevation around here right now).

i'd guess the 799s would leave your DCR close to on-par with your stock setup while maintaining the top-end flow 317s are known for. 706s would bump CR up a notch, increasing responsiveness / efficiency, but have less top end due to the smaller ports & valves (unless you worked them up). the higher compression would also leave a little less tuning margin.

Last edited by _zebra; 08-31-2024 at 07:26 PM. Reason: must've been drunk when i wrote that middle part
Old 08-30-2024, 09:05 PM
  #5  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (36)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: somewhere in TX
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

706's, 243s work great on a 6.0 and run reaaally freakin good. High compression and awesome torque it'll fly from idle through wherever you cam dies off at. built this combo more than once for poor boy performance parts out of the boneyard.
They also wake up 6.2's in trucks in the area where most daily driven trucks work at.
Dont care what the numbers are the above is great stuff it in and roll parts that the factory didn't really intend to be mixed and matched.
It's the modern day equivalent to the 70's when you could throw a set of 2 barrell 305 heads on top of a 350 and make a screamer out of a smog turd
Old 08-31-2024, 07:31 PM
  #6  
makes children cry
iTrader: (5)
 
_zebra's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: cold & windy
Posts: 2,808
Likes: 0
Received 432 Likes on 354 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 01WS6/tamu
706's, 243s work great on a 6.0 and run reaaally freakin good. High compression and awesome torque it'll fly from idle through wherever you cam dies off at. built this combo more than once for poor boy performance parts out of the boneyard.
They also wake up 6.2's in trucks in the area where most daily driven trucks work at.
Dont care what the numbers are the above is great stuff it in and roll parts that the factory didn't really intend to be mixed and matched.
It's the modern day equivalent to the 70's when you could throw a set of 2 barrell 305 heads on top of a 350 and make a screamer out of a smog turd
if it was a LQ4 with dished pistons, i'd immediately jump to 706s (which have smaller combustion chambers than the 243/799 castings)... but he is already starting with LQ9 flat tops, so they already bump the compression some, and the 799s would flow better on the top end plus provide better tuning flexibility due to the slightly lower compression than the 706s.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RedXray
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
15
04-22-2020 02:18 PM
india6
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
6
12-14-2019 09:32 AM
Shourn
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
1
10-15-2014 03:19 PM
ProStreet83C10
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
7
07-12-2006 09:11 PM



Quick Reply: Too much static compression?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:09 AM.