Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

tr 220 vs tr224?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-06-2004, 11:12 AM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
dubrado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: texas
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default tr 220 vs tr224?

I'm not sure which cam to get, I will be getting a tci 3000 stall for my setup but I don't know which cam to get. I'm afraid the tr220 cam will be too small for my liking and that the tr224 will be to big for my liking.

What are ya'lls experiences and opinions about both?
also the tci 3k stall will be ok w/o a shift kit correct? I think the STR ration is like 2.25:1 or maybe it's 2.5:1 I can't remember
Old 06-06-2004, 11:15 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Deckhand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Im wondering about the same question.

Im thinking about getting the tr220 cam coupled with my 3200 stall, and 125shot
Old 06-06-2004, 01:34 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Deckhand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Also, what LSA is recommended 112 or 114 for a stalled truck.

TIA
Old 06-06-2004, 08:19 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CHAGO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Northwest Houston
Posts: 5,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

bump!!!
Old 06-06-2004, 09:36 PM
  #5  
TECH Veteran
 
Hit Man X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

From my readings in the past the 224 will pull to a slightly higher RPM vs the 220. I'd say 200-400 RPM more at the most. Power should be about the same between then.

I believe you'll want the wider LSA for the nitrous.

LSA should determine how the powerband peaks and tapers too. Oh as well as idle quality and idle vac.

I'm kinda zoned out now, so that's a few things that came to my mind...
Old 06-06-2004, 10:49 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
dubrado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: texas
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think i read on a few threads that the 112 will keep the peak power at a lower rpm than the 114 tr224...the ls1 guys seem to not have much issue w/224s and even consider them as very mild cams...so I think it would be a nice moderate/slightly aggressive cam for the 5.3s

that's what I've understood so far from reading old threads
Old 06-06-2004, 11:12 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Deckhand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

yea, but the low lsa sounds wicked..

i think ill get the 114 anyway though
Old 06-07-2004, 08:23 AM
  #8  
TECH Resident
 
mudz5.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you have a 4.8 or 5.3 I would stick with the 220. The street manners are going to be better with the 220. I think the 224 would be too big for a 5.3 or lower but that is my oppinion. The lower the lsa will bring the power band down a little or peak I should say but the lower may also give you tuning troubles. I ended up getting a cartek m cam, although not installed yet, the numbers are 218/222, 563, 113. So I went for middle of the road I guess. Gustin did a write up on the TR220 with and without the stall. As far as the stall without the shiftkit...I would recco the shiftkit too. It will only help your trans especially if your gonna spray. Transgo and billet servo's.
Old 06-07-2004, 10:58 AM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
dubrado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: texas
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i think i might go ahead and get the 224, because I don't want to get the milder 220 and change my mind and regret my choice.
I don't tow or haul anything so I dont mind not having low end grunt
Old 06-07-2004, 11:08 AM
  #10  
TECH Junkie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 3,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dubrado
i think i might go ahead and get the 224, because I don't want to get the milder 220 and change my mind and regret my choice.
I don't tow or haul anything so I dont mind not having low end grunt
I love the TR224 114. In my Z28 it feels like stock in the low rpms, and above 3500 it comes alive. I have the idle set at 900rpms and its hard to tell it has a cam. IMO the TR224 is not to big for a 5.3. A T-Rex maybe, but now a little 224.

With your set up though i'd go with the 112LSA to make driving more fun. The power will come on a little sooner, and the lope is known to make panties wet.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
zblee
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
3
11-11-2015 12:41 AM
nrmskate
GM Parts Classifieds
0
08-11-2015 02:44 PM
mr03silverado
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
10
07-17-2015 02:15 PM
Atomic
GM Parts Classifieds
9
07-11-2015 03:51 PM



Quick Reply: tr 220 vs tr224?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:13 PM.