Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

TR220... 112 or 114???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-09-2004, 11:32 AM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
Quikenuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Brusly Louisiana
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default TR220... 112 or 114???

Ive decided on the thunder racing 220/220 .551 .551 but cant decide between getting the 112 or 114. Do you think the loss of some driveability will be worth the HP gains in going with the 112? I guess I am asking how much driveability will be lost in going 112. How will the powerband differ between the 2. Goeff at thunder says 112 for sure, but id like to know from some guys with experience with this type of cam on the street. truck is 5.3 stock heads LT headers no cats with custom y pipe. cut out. tt3000 converter.
Old 10-09-2004, 12:25 PM
  #2  
On The Tree
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stroudsburg, Pa
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

cant help you with your question but nice times
Old 10-09-2004, 12:31 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
FILE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Truck Heaven
Posts: 7,276
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Do plan on going with FI in the future?
Old 10-09-2004, 01:41 PM
  #4  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Sport Side's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd listen to Geoff.
Old 10-09-2004, 01:43 PM
  #5  
Formerly one92rs
iTrader: (1)
 
one03sierra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: league city texas
Posts: 4,205
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Talking

there are a lot of people running 112's on the street. if you like a lope it will do fine.
Old 10-09-2004, 01:46 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
12sec.5.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Pierre Part, LA
Posts: 1,161
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old 10-09-2004, 02:49 PM
  #7  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Sport Side's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ask Geoff if both cams use the same valve events.

I'm guessing. But they probably do, and the 114 lsa was made available with less overlap for better idle characteristics.
Old 10-09-2004, 03:24 PM
  #8  
Teching In
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Garland Texas
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SportSide 5.3
Ask Geoff if both cams use the same valve events.

I'm guessing. But they probably do, and the 114 lsa was made available with less overlap for better idle characteristics.

How is it possible to change the LSA without changing the valve events?
Old 10-09-2004, 03:43 PM
  #9  
TECH Addict
 
marc_w's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central, MA
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had one on a 112 in my mostly stock 6.0. Without a loose converter like that, it was too quirky for me.

I think you'll be perfectly happy with the 112. In all honesty, I don't think either cam is really all that noticeably different from each other.

I've got soundclips of mine at idle, up all over the site here... you're bound to find them with a search.
Old 10-09-2004, 03:48 PM
  #10  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Sport Side's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Silver2004
How is it possible to change the LSA without changing the valve events?
Thanks.

Yeah, the lsa is derived by the valve events. Or a by product.
I'm dumb

----

By the way, would you still mind asking Geoff for those valve events of both camshafts? I'd be interested. If not, I'd be more than willing to do it myself.

Thanks.


Quick Reply: TR220... 112 or 114???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:08 AM.