tr224-112
04-12-2005, 01:57 PM
#11
Originally Posted by joejoe
just talked 2 david down there at thunder racing he said the tr-224-112 would not work 4 me he told me 2 run like a comp 216-220 at 114
04-12-2005, 02:10 PM
#12
12 Second Truck Club
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The problem with the Whiplle guys is they lose alot of their low end grunt with these big cams. That's probably why Thunder recoemded the smaller cam.. N/A I'd do the TR224 NP. 
Then again I'm the nut using the 226 cams in my 5.3.. Hahaha
Then again I'm the nut using the 226 cams in my 5.3.. Hahaha
04-12-2005, 07:44 PM
#16
17,16,15,14,13,12,11 Drvr
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mont Belvieu, Texas
Posts: 6,713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
im running a 223 225 564 571 114 and bottomend feels great and pulles to 6600 1-2 and 6400 2-3 5800 3-4 no problems lol 5000 in 4th then let off man was i moving sorry back to the cam if the little 4.8 that could is running it then the 5.3 will do just fine with a 2600 stall.
04-12-2005, 07:52 PM
#17
12 Second Truck Club
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 02denali
226 man that is small. what about that 224-228-581-588-114+4 i ran. hahahah. had to dude.
Remember when I posted up that I was going to do the 226 cam and everyone freaked out and said it was WAAAY too big? Besides, I have a 5.3L, not the 6.0L LOL
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jvoisel
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
35
08-03-2012 09:08 AM
LS1TRUCKGUY
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
12
04-09-2012 10:31 PM