Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

tsp 224r

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-2010, 06:30 PM
  #31  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
06murder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: ludowici,ga
Posts: 1,698
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

thanks a million and one budhayes
Old 11-04-2010, 06:26 PM
  #32  
TECH Apprentice
 
TrickyTransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

For what it's worth...

It's what I have in my LQ9, and I've got 300hp at the rear wheels tuned.
Count on getting a larger intake, throttle body, injectors, headers, new crossover, air intake, cats, and exhaust plus a tune to get it anywhere near right.
It's OK... I went with 114lsa for more street manners and a more sporty sound, but it's still kinda nasty as a daily driver. With a Flowmaster super 40, it sounds like a jetthro's 70 chevy 350 with cherrybombs. (Not exactly what I was hoping for)
The engine will want to breathe, and it won't be able to do that if all the rest is stock equip.
Anybody that tells you that it's an easy direct swap is false.

Oh... and count on premium fuel.

Last edited by TrickyTransAm; 11-04-2010 at 06:31 PM.
Old 11-04-2010, 06:49 PM
  #33  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (10)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: kentucky
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Rwhp sounds kinda low to have a 224 in it. I was thinking a stock 6.0 put down more power than that. Why would you need a new intake the truck intake works fine with just a 224.
Old 11-04-2010, 06:57 PM
  #34  
TECH Apprentice
 
TrickyTransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 01 5.3
Rwhp sounds kinda low to have a 224 in it. I was thinking a stock 6.0 put down more power than that. Why would you need a new intake the truck intake works fine with just a 224.
I thought so too.. I just had it dyno'd. The tuner had difficulties getting it to perform with the current stock hardware.
The 5.3L manifold is "Good" up to the 6.0L, but apparently when you add a cam and more compression, the engine can't breathe through a straw.

The stock LQ9 puts out 345HP at the Flywheel.
Remember...your going through a transmission, transfer case (So at least 25% loss) and 265 tires. SO 300hp at the wheels puts the engine at around 380hp+ at the flywheel. But, based on the data coming from the wideband, and the MAF it was restricted.
Power after about 4700 RPM falls off quickly due to detonation because of 89 octane fuel. Better fuel would help, but still...

Believe me...I don't have tons of cash to spend - I'm just trying to save someone else the trouble of getting half way into the project, and finding out what I did.
Old 11-04-2010, 07:24 PM
  #35  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (10)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: kentucky
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Do you have headers and other stuff with the motor. If so you should be up close to 380 rwhp. Maybe some higher octane fuel and a good tune will help it out.
Old 11-04-2010, 07:27 PM
  #36  
TECH Apprentice
 
TrickyTransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 01 5.3
Do you have headers and other stuff with the motor. If so you should be up close to 380 rwhp. Maybe some higher octane fuel and a good tune will help it out.
No, right now Stock exhaust manifolds, stock crossover with stock 5.3L cats.
5.3L Intake and stock 75mm cable throttle body. Stock MAF, and Air Cleaner assembly and resonator. K&N filter soon to be pulled out and replaced with factory air cleaner element.
34lb/hr injectors are happy at 72% duty cycle
So, I tried to keep it as close to a "Direct Swap" as possible to see what gains would be found.

Here's what it sounds like, in the event you wanted to know.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnLmwkQkRPg

Last edited by TrickyTransAm; 11-04-2010 at 07:35 PM.
Old 11-04-2010, 07:35 PM
  #37  
TECH Enthusiast
 
jrmchevyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: FL
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by TrickyTransAm
No, right now Stock exhaust manifolds, stock crossover with stock 5.3L cats.
5.3L Intake and stock 75mm cable throttle body. Stock MAF, and Air Cleaner assembly and resonator. K&N filter soon to be pulled out and replaced with factory air cleaner element.
34lb/hr injectors are happy at 72% duty cycle
So, I tried to keep it as close to a "Direct Swap" as possible to see what gains would be found.
ah that is why you were so low "300rwhp" with your 6.0L. Let your engine breathe some more get some long tube headers and at least mod the stock air box and I bet you will even feel the difference. The stock manifolds are robbing quite a bit of your power potential.
Old 11-04-2010, 07:58 PM
  #38  
TECH Apprentice
 
TrickyTransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I agree.
Not to hijack the OP thread, but this is what you will have by doing a direct swap 6.0L with the 224R cam, so keep that in mind. Being you already have headers...you should be good to go.

Last edited by TrickyTransAm; 11-04-2010 at 08:12 PM.
Old 11-04-2010, 08:18 PM
  #39  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (10)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: kentucky
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I see. Was just wondering why so low with what you have. I thought you probably had headers and other stuff. So the cam is seeing no benefit without the supporting mods.
Old 11-04-2010, 08:26 PM
  #40  
TECH Apprentice
 
TrickyTransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 01 5.3
So the cam is seeing no benefit without the supporting mods.
Exactly. The components have to work together.
It's not an "All you gotta do"


Quick Reply: tsp 224r



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:25 PM.