twin srew or radix....
#105
12 Second Truck Club
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PSM
wow I go to bed and the next morning I wake up to find this thread has already doubled... amazing
#107
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ontario
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Naked AV
Funny, I've never heard of a Whipple failure, or a Kenne Bell failure. Where is this reliability/dependability data coming from?
#108
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ontario
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fandango
Twin screws vent boosted air back into the inlet tract, yes?
While the MP112 lets air bypass the lobes.
Correct me if I am wrong.
While the MP112 lets air bypass the lobes.
Correct me if I am wrong.
#110
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Detroit
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PSM
You always havea way of posting very well written pieces that are hard to argue with. And I do agree with you 100%, the lysolm twin screw by itself is far better than the moddified roots. Still you currently cannot beat the package deal of the radix.
Maybe this is the engineer in me, but what if you made/had machined an adapter plate for the whipple blower to fit on the intercooler manifold that came with the radix... It would probably be very expensive, and complex, but it would be unique
Maybe this is the engineer in me, but what if you made/had machined an adapter plate for the whipple blower to fit on the intercooler manifold that came with the radix... It would probably be very expensive, and complex, but it would be unique