Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

What is my best cam option? Lq4 swap, TT3000 in NBS Tahoe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-02-2010, 02:34 PM
  #21  
On The Tree
 
Z'06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nickleahy23
im getting confused lol..some say that a tr220 in their 6.0 got eaten up and you could barely tell it was there, so to go bigger..some say no bigger then a tr220 and some have a cam smaller then a 220 and love it..
I don't get it either. The TR220-112 is a beast in my 5.3L Tahoe with a 3K-3200 stall. I'm not sure why a 6.0L Tahoe wouldn't run fine with a slightly bigger cam like the TR224-112, all else equal.
Old 06-02-2010, 08:27 PM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (137)
 
low2001gmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Elsa, South Texas (956) 802-7700
Posts: 1,109
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

tr224 is as big as you want to go and will work great with your stall. any bigger, it would be a dog. any smaller, you eventually will end up with a 224 so might as well make the expense one time and save in the long run. the 24 wheels really slow you down and affect mileage so power gains are limited. good luck with your project, rob.
Old 06-04-2010, 02:50 PM
  #23  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
nickleahy23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Portage,WI
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Alright well i suppose im looking for a Tr-224 then..do i want -112 or -114? what is the difference in that?

would this be fine?
Thunder Racing Custom Camshaft
"TR 224-114" - 224/224 .563/.563 114 LSA 1700-6600 RPM
Old 06-04-2010, 03:07 PM
  #24  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
 
TX Tahoe Z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,836
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

A 112 will give you a choppier idle than a 114. Lobe separation determines where peak tq is and how broad it is, thus a wider lobe separation will have a broader power band and build power throughout the RPMs, where a tighter lobe separation will build power quickly, but fall of more quickly too.
Old 06-04-2010, 04:19 PM
  #25  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
nickleahy23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Portage,WI
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TX Tahoe Z71
A 112 will give you a choppier idle than a 114. Lobe separation determines where peak tq is and how broad it is, thus a wider lobe separation will have a broader power band and build power throughout the RPMs, where a tighter lobe separation will build power quickly, but fall of more quickly too.
alright sweet..so looks like im wanting a 112 since i want a little chop to the idle..thanks for the help
Old 06-04-2010, 06:12 PM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Jake99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nickleahy23
alright sweet..so looks like im wanting a 112 since i want a little chop to the idle..thanks for the help
Go with a 112 and have the advance it atleast 2 degrees, 4 if you can. that will help the power come in a little sooner.
Old 06-04-2010, 06:16 PM
  #27  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
nickleahy23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Portage,WI
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jake99
Go with a 112 and have the advance it atleast 2 degrees, 4 if you can. that will help the power come in a little sooner.
im guessing you mean when I install it to advance it a bit? Ill have to do some reading up on all of that...my buddy and I will be doin it later this summer..never done one on a ls motor, only 350s and ****
Old 06-04-2010, 07:21 PM
  #28  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (10)
 
Bumpers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tupelo Ms
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What about something like a 222/224 on a 112 ? I'm fixing to swap my tr220 for a 224..but I only have a 5.3. I would run somthing around 222-226 duration
Old 06-04-2010, 10:06 PM
  #29  
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
budhayes3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hackensack, NJ
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nickleahy23
im guessing you mean when I install it to advance it a bit? Ill have to do some reading up on all of that...my buddy and I will be doin it later this summer..never done one on a ls motor, only 350s and ****
Actually he's talking about advance that's ground into the cam, this can be determined by comparing the ICL to the LSA...LSA-ICL=* of advance ground in (114 LSA - 110 ICL = 4* of advance ground in). ICL=Intake Center Line
Old 06-05-2010, 01:32 AM
  #30  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
nickleahy23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Portage,WI
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by budhayes3
Actually he's talking about advance that's ground into the cam, this can be determined by comparing the ICL to the LSA...LSA-ICL=* of advance ground in (114 LSA - 110 ICL = 4* of advance ground in). ICL=Intake Center Line
good to know..thanks man..like i said..i have a lot of reading to do about cams...Im pretty mechanically inclined, but ive never torn into a newer ls motor...nor have i looked into cams and ****...Im reading all that I can to make sure I get what will make me happy the first time..I mean until i can scoop a tvs 1900 lol
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OHsixLS3
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
14
12-27-2016 09:30 AM
GrooveCityZ71
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
7
08-31-2015 12:05 PM
04BlackGmc
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
2
07-16-2015 04:10 PM
Cowboy17
FORCED INDUCTION
6
07-09-2015 08:22 PM
NuckenFuts
FORCED INDUCTION
32
07-09-2015 08:45 AM



Quick Reply: What is my best cam option? Lq4 swap, TT3000 in NBS Tahoe



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:13 PM.