Who has put a FAST 102 on their 6.2?
#11
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
From: Bakersfield, CA
I know, merely posted to illustrate that truck intakes (even oem) have less design limitations than car intakes. The additional plenum volume and straighter runners are more suited to supply an engines air/fuel needs.
Before I would purchase a car intake for your truck I would PM Tony Mamo @ AFR to get the lowdown. He is R&D Manager for AFR and a FAST intake guru with countless hours porting intakes with the use of a flowbench.
Best of luck with your combo
Before I would purchase a car intake for your truck I would PM Tony Mamo @ AFR to get the lowdown. He is R&D Manager for AFR and a FAST intake guru with countless hours porting intakes with the use of a flowbench.
Best of luck with your combo
#12
I've read through a lot of the posts on LS1tech and several show that when a good set of heads (even factory) are paired up with the truck intake and then put on a flowbench the intake chokes off plenty of flow. Right now when I go WOT I have a small vacuum dip, so the engine is wanting more air than what my intake can provide and I've ruled out the airbox. I don't think the factory manifold is nearly as good as the FAST truck manifold.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AHelm3
Dynamometer Results & Comparisons
3
04-08-2016 07:51 AM
05GMC4.8
GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion
5
08-07-2015 09:55 PM