WOW, maybe 4.8's dont suck, another gtech screen shot
#1
Thread Starter
single digit dreamer
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,743
Likes: 2
From: omaha ne
WOW, maybe 4.8's dont suck, another gtech screen shot
got some new gtech runs with this lowly 4.8. i took off 108lbs of unneeded weight and have about 60lbs less fuel that before. the first run is from the other day bone stock full weight, the next 3 runs are from tonight. i practiced my launch too, turns out auto4 works best and brake staling it to about 1500 is the quickest, a higher brake stall was slower.
1st run DA was 684feet
2-4 runs DA were 850feet
1st run DA was 684feet
2-4 runs DA were 850feet
#5
Re: WOW, maybe 4.8's dont suck, another gtech screen shot
DAMN MINE WEIGHED 4650 AT THE TRACK SCALES AT HRP.
ALL I HAD WAS AN EMPTY ALUMINUM TOOL BOX IN THE BACK, AND ITS A STEPSIDE
ALL I HAD WAS AN EMPTY ALUMINUM TOOL BOX IN THE BACK, AND ITS A STEPSIDE
#6
Thread Starter
single digit dreamer
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,743
Likes: 2
From: omaha ne
Re: WOW, maybe 4.8's dont suck, another gtech screen shot
i have no idea what it weighs, that is the stated curb weight. the weight that i enter doesn't effect the ET but it does make the hp and tq read low. thats ok with me.
Trending Topics
#8
Thread Starter
single digit dreamer
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,743
Likes: 2
From: omaha ne
Re: WOW, maybe 4.8's dont suck, another gtech screen shot
got another one for ya, this is a screen of g force vs time, you can see both shifts clearly. if the shift points were correct you wouldn't be able to see the loss of RWTQ, when i can adjust that it should get a litte quicker.
#10
Re: WOW, maybe 4.8's dont suck, another gtech screen shot
...so that should mean that it weighs more and is slower because it has skid plates and heavier jounce bumpers
or maybe I just missed the sarcasm
or maybe I just missed the sarcasm