Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

XR265 vs XR259 in a 5.3L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-08-2009, 11:16 AM
  #21  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Mark Johnson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Fe New Mexico
Posts: 1,723
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Yes- interesting indeed........................
Old 02-08-2009, 12:03 PM
  #22  
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
budhayes3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hackensack, NJ
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NicD
Please tell me you have a dyno graph.
Sorry man, no dyno graph I can give you my impression of the cam if you want. As mentioned, it's slightly different than the off-the shelf cam as it's on a 114 which is what Comp recommended at the time. It also has .520* of exhaust duration as opposed to .522, because that's the way Comp was grinding it 4-5 years ago when I bought and installed it.

It's a very mild cam and a perfect daily driver that sounds almost stock. Noticeable improvement over stock when properly tuned, and it doesn't need a higher stall torque converter, although it would benefit from a mild converter, it's not necessary. When my truck was on 33's at the stock height with bolt on's only, I ran 16.5@81.7 mph, after the cam and tuning, I improved to 15.6@89.5 mph. 60' times stayed about the same, improving from a 2.6 to a 2.4...I attribute this to the 33's. I haven't run the truck with the long tubes and efans, or the 31' tires and lowered stance, so I don't know where I'm at now.

Hope this helps in some way.
Old 02-08-2009, 12:08 PM
  #23  
TECH Resident
 
006rcsb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: bakersfield, ca
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i called comp a while back to ask them about the xr259, xr265 and the xfi260 xtreme truck cam and was told the xfi260 would be the cam to get because it has less overlap and faster ramp rates,he said that the faster ramp rates bring down the power band, and it would more than likely pass smog, much easier than the 259 would, and it would probably idle like stock. when i asked about the the xfi261 and xfi266 he said i was just splitting hairs and it would only be about a 5hp difference between them. this is just what i was told from a comp cams rep over the phone.
Old 02-08-2009, 12:28 PM
  #24  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
NicD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 006rcsb
i called comp a while back to ask them about the xr259, xr265 and the xfi260 xtreme truck cam and was told the xfi260 would be the cam to get because it has less overlap and faster ramp rates,he said that the faster ramp rates bring down the power band, and it would more than likely pass smog, much easier than the 259 would, and it would probably idle like stock. when i asked about the the xfi261 and xfi266 he said i was just splitting hairs and it would only be about a 5hp difference between them. this is just what i was told from a comp cams rep over the phone.
Wow, that's crazy. Besides the obvious difference of the .050 duration specs the valve timing events are WAY different. That xfi260 looks like it would be a total turd compared to the 259 or the 265 up top for sure.
Old 02-08-2009, 12:35 PM
  #25  
TECH Resident
 
006rcsb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: bakersfield, ca
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thats kinda what i thought after looking at the actual cam cards, but he is supposed to know what he is talking about right? i was looking at getting the xr259 but i don't know for sure about it, i like the 265 too, the comp cams tech was pretty insistent on that xfi260, most of the sound clips i have heard the 265 idles smoother than the 259 too , i just dont want to have to swap back to the stock cam every 2 years just to get it smogged another thing that worries me is having vacuum assisted brakes, because more overlap means less vacuum at idle.
Old 02-08-2009, 01:43 PM
  #26  
Staging Lane
 
Lama1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I installed this Lunati in my 5.3 flex. It woke up the engine big time, but the idle is super smooth, idles at 650RPM with a Blackbear tune. No dyno numbers sorry. Pulls strong from about 2k up to past where my tach ends. 113LSA good for smog check. It was also the lowest priced LS1 cam I could find from Summit, was like $309.00. I am using with LS6 springs. Runs nice, and has low overlap and the intake centerline of 109 matches the 243 head valve size perfectly:



Hydraulic roller. Excellent increase in torque and midrange power! Has exceptionally wide power band with very crisp throttle response. A great replacement cam for the factory LS-6 factory camshaft for those wanting a better performance camshaft.

Advertised Duration (Int/Exh): 262/268
Duration @ .050 (Int/Exh): 212/218
Gross Valve Lift (Int/Exh): .531/.531
LSA/ICL: 113/109
Valve Lash (Int/Exh): Hyd/Hyd
RPM Range: 1600-6400
Includes: Cam Only

Part Number: 60510
Old 02-08-2009, 03:48 PM
  #27  
Custm2500's Rude Friend
iTrader: (17)
 
1FastBrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: JunkYard
Posts: 14,383
Received 786 Likes on 652 Posts
Default

All though the 265 is cut on a 114 it also has 2 degrees advance built in. if you look closely it instals on a 112.... also several people have passed smog test here in CA with that cam. CA has some of the most toughest restrictions too. testes are preformed with a sniffer up the tail pipe at Idle, then on a wheel dyno with a load at 15 MPH and then at 25MPH

Last edited by 1FastBrick; 02-08-2009 at 04:00 PM.
Old 02-08-2009, 07:40 PM
  #28  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
LMSeven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LMSeven
I got the RPM graph, and accidentally left it at my friends house, I will post it asap.
I know it's blurry, I need a scanner. The N/A pull ended just before 6000 rpm.

Last edited by LMSeven; 02-08-2009 at 07:47 PM.
Old 02-08-2009, 07:52 PM
  #29  
TECH Resident
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: East of the east bay CA
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Man I hope I can pass smog with the 265 since I'm installing it in about a week LOL.
Old 02-08-2009, 08:23 PM
  #30  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
LMSeven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sharky05
Man I hope I can pass smog with the 265 since I'm installing it in about a week LOL.

You should be fine with a good tune, I'm not 100% but a few people on here said a 224/224 is the max for emissions testing.


Quick Reply: XR265 vs XR259 in a 5.3L



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:49 AM.