Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

XR265HR in a 5.3 dyno graph and thoughts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-17-2012, 02:42 AM
  #91  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
LOBO2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 373
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

My truck is mostly stock with a few mods (look at sig). If I installed the same cam as the OP used would the valve springs & pushrods be the only changes I would need to make? Would my stock converter be good? I don't have a tune, would I need one after the cam install?
Old 06-17-2012, 04:14 AM
  #92  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
AndysC3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Minot, ND
Posts: 2,884
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LOBO2
My truck is mostly stock with a few mods (look at sig). If I installed the same cam as the OP used would the valve springs & pushrods be the only changes I would need to make? Would my stock converter be good? I don't have a tune, would I need one after the cam install?
This is a good mild cam for a dd. The stock converter work and you could use the same tune. But a retune will net more power. And even a stock truck will be so much better with a 2600 rpm converter.

Last edited by 1FastBrick; 06-17-2012 at 09:12 PM.
Old 06-17-2012, 06:40 PM
  #93  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
LOBO2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 373
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

So would a torque converter be a better move to make for my next mod?
Old 06-17-2012, 09:17 PM
  #94  
Custm2500's Rude Friend
iTrader: (17)
 
1FastBrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: JunkYard
Posts: 14,387
Received 786 Likes on 652 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LOBO2
So would a torque converter be a better move to make for my next mod?
Depending on your mileage you may want to do the cam first. If you put a torque converter in a higher mileage trans and the trans fails, You may ruin the converter. At the very least, it would need to be cut open and inspected. If you plan on having the trans gone through, I would wait until then to do the converter.

The up side to this cam is that it still works well on a stock converter.
Old 06-18-2012, 04:58 AM
  #95  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
LOBO2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 373
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1FastBrick
Depending on your mileage you may want to do the cam first. If you put a torque converter in a higher mileage trans and the trans fails, You may ruin the converter. At the very least, it would need to be cut open and inspected. If you plan on having the trans gone through, I would wait until then to do the converter.

The up side to this cam is that it still works well on a stock converter.
Thanks for the help. I had never thought about it from that angle.

My truck is a 2004, but it is just now getting close to 27,000 miles. The trans should be ok I hope, lol!

BTW, even with the low miles on my engine would I still need to install new valve springs & pushrods with the cam?
Old 06-18-2012, 05:21 AM
  #96  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
AndysC3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Minot, ND
Posts: 2,884
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I would. The stock springs were not designed for aftermarket cams. Just added insurance. And their not that expensive. Cheaper than a new motor that's for sure.
Old 08-31-2012, 10:43 AM
  #97  
Registered abuser
iTrader: (10)
 
1BadAction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Briar, TX!
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by NicD
Alright, it got late so I didn't throw any revs or anything but this is just the truck idling so you can hear what the small lope sounds like. It was recorded from about 5 feet behind the truck. The exhaust is a custom 2 magnaflow muffler setup in series, single 3" otherwise the vid is pretty self explanatory.

http://gonicd.com/videos/xr265_idleonly.wmv
Old 08-31-2012, 09:46 PM
  #98  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Go5.3tt06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I'm curious which best to run that cam 212/218 high lift or low lift?
Old 09-01-2012, 04:33 PM
  #99  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
NicD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Best is a very broad term without any qualifications. Best for what?
Old 09-01-2012, 11:35 PM
  #100  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Go5.3tt06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NicD
Best is a very broad term without any qualifications. Best for what?
I just try to ask about that cam from low lift and high lift. From my understanding for high lift is high rpm around 6400 and low lift go past 6000 rpm. Which is good for n/a motor and later boost. I noctied lot of people run low lift.


Quick Reply: XR265HR in a 5.3 dyno graph and thoughts



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:59 PM.