Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Y-pipe, H-pipe or X-pipe?? what would you run??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-24-2011, 02:56 PM
  #21  
makes children cry
iTrader: (5)
 
_zebra's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: cold & windy
Posts: 2,808
Likes: 0
Received 432 Likes on 354 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spoolin
Get 4v heads if you want that kinda sound.
32 Valve Cylinder Heads LSX Blocks 32VLSX Rocker Arms Pushrods
a little pricey, though
Old 07-24-2011, 04:46 PM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
2doorfury's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Franklin, IN
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by budhayes3
For an x-pipe to actually be affective and work as designed, the pipes leading up to it should be of equal length, so that the x-pipe can properly scavenge the exhaust pulses and allow for good exhaust velocity. This can be hard to achieve considering the space constrictions on our trucks, but it is doable. Bill (trever1t) used to have a real nice true dual system with an x on his truck, and it was worked around a transfer case nonetheless. Whatever path you choose, the exhaust pipe diameter(s) should match your setup and power goals...if you go too small you leave a lot of power on the table, and if you go too big you may loose some exhaust velocity and suffer a power loss down low Just my .02
i was thinking 3'' exhaust pipe. thats about as big as a muffler shop around my arear carrys. but it should be plenty..i got a mods list to get done. but for a cam, headers, and 100 shot..would 3'' be too much?
Old 07-25-2011, 10:41 AM
  #23  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
TimDave217's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Manhattan. Ks
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There's a sticky over that can help you in this situation espicially with the size of piping you want to use. But I have a custom X-pipe on mine with a magnaflow muffler that also has a x-pipe design in it and it sounds amazingggg. but not anymore since I'm going to be F/I in the future its for sallleeee!!!! lol
Old 07-25-2011, 12:26 PM
  #24  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
mhotrodscooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: jennings,louisiana
Posts: 1,750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I run 3" duals & dual Manual cutouts with a magnaflow muffler with X-pipe built in. I hate the sound & drone.
Old 07-25-2011, 01:39 PM
  #25  
Resident Retard
iTrader: (31)
 
BlackGMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Worth - TX
Posts: 17,216
Received 20 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

I went with a 3.0 to 3.5 ypipe and a full 3.5 catback with a magnaflow straight through muffler. I noticed a decent gain with that change. Btw 3.5 single has more volume than a dual 2.5 setup plus it is cheaper.
Old 07-25-2011, 11:16 PM
  #26  
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
budhayes3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hackensack, NJ
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2doorfury
i was thinking 3'' exhaust pipe. thats about as big as a muffler shop around my arear carrys. but it should be plenty..i got a mods list to get done. but for a cam, headers, and 100 shot..would 3'' be too much?
If you're talking dual 3" on a cam only 5.3, I feel that 3" would be overkill, just my opinion. Guys with mild 5.3's have reported a loss down low just by installing Pacesetters with the 3" collectors and y-pipe, into a 3" single back. My guess is that the dual 3" in the y-pipe has an effect on the exhaust velocity and evacuation from the cylinders.

A single 3" cat-back would be just right for a mild 5.3 IMO, but may not be optimal if you're planning more cubes in your future. FWIW, when I installed my StainlessWorks LT's, a didn't notice any loss down low, but my headers and y-pipe have smaller 2.5" collectors and y-pipe, into a 3" cat-back (1 3/4" primaries). Now, if I ever get the dough to put my LQ9 together, I feel that the smaller collectors will definitely hold me back...maybe not so much the y-pipe, but definitely the collectors. Optimally, for a N/A 6.0, I like Corey's set-up, with a 3.5" single cat-back. If boosted, or with a nasty cam and headwork, 4" could be justified and work well. IIRC, Roger (AKlowriderZ71) is currently running a 4" cat-back with his 5.3, but he's boosted and cammed which has a definite affect on the equation
Old 07-26-2011, 10:14 AM
  #27  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
swift700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'm going to switch to a system like Roger's as well. I think the single sytem sounds cleanest and is such a sleeper setup. The 4" moves tons of air. I don't like the sound of true duals and really think the two pipes straight out the back look awful. One out each side isn't so bad but why bother when a single system is all that you need?
Old 07-26-2011, 09:22 PM
  #28  
TECH Resident
 
oldred95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Enid, OK
Posts: 870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've heard good things about the flowmaster scavenger y and I actually have one but I have yet to install it. Going with a single 4 inch on the 95 with a MBRP muffler. We'll see.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stealthperf
General Truck Racing and Discussion
34
02-14-2016 11:35 AM
The_W
FUEL SYSTEMS
4
08-15-2015 08:07 AM
Mossyoakglock
GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion
0
07-17-2015 08:30 AM
Chiphead
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
7
07-13-2015 10:16 PM
Mzay
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
9
07-06-2015 11:03 PM



Quick Reply: Y-pipe, H-pipe or X-pipe?? what would you run??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:59 PM.