Youre opinions on this Cam
12-20-2004, 04:56 PM
#12
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: :texas:
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mrr23
well that was ROGER VINCI's comments i posted for him as his computer was down. but, on the other hand i do use the Vinci tuner and do field testing for them on the car side of it. no, the vinci/ crane tuner doesn't get rid of torque management. it does, however, set the parameters very wide. apparantly, you were still exceeding that parameter. i would like to know what cam program you were using with the cam you have. also, what other changes you made with it to try and get rid of the knock and lean condition.
I did try the other programs with the same luck.
Like I said for a somewhat stock truck I bet it's fine But in my case with my mods it was just not going to work.
12-20-2004, 04:58 PM
#13
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: :texas:
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 03silverado5.3
How much HP are you getting out of a cam, rockers, springs, etc swap along with a tc is it possible ill see 13s with out a radix.
I think they listed everything at 58hp.
I would have to dig up my notes to check that.
12-20-2004, 05:33 PM
#14
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 4,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2redgmc
If I remember right it was number 3. I took all the timing out that I could, you can't add fuel so as far as i know that was all I could do.
I did try the other programs with the same luck.
Like I said for a somewhat stock truck I bet it's fine But in my case with my mods it was just not going to work.
I did try the other programs with the same luck.
Like I said for a somewhat stock truck I bet it's fine But in my case with my mods it was just not going to work.
12-20-2004, 05:54 PM
#15
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Armpit of East TX
Posts: 9,342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If it were me I wouldn't go with such a large split in your truck with the small cubes. It will make the bottom end lack a little. Maybe a 220/224 on a 112. With those kind of lift numbers on that cam though, it will survive with the ls6 springs. That would be a lot cheaper spring and just fine for that cam. Other cams may need more spring thoguh.
12-20-2004, 07:05 PM
#16
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kernersville, NC
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mrr23
to change fuel with the truck tuner you go into the injector sizing and lower the injector size. by lowering the injector size without actually changing the injectors, it will add more fuel.
Installed my Crane tune this weekend and it seems to pull pretty strong. I'll get a chance to test it's cam tuning abilities in the next month too.
12-20-2004, 07:09 PM
#17
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kernersville, NC
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Flyer
If it were me I wouldn't go with such a large split in your truck with the small cubes. It will make the bottom end lack a little. Maybe a 220/224 on a 112. With those kind of lift numbers on that cam though, it will survive with the ls6 springs. That would be a lot cheaper spring and just fine for that cam. Other cams may need more spring thoguh.
12-20-2004, 07:26 PM
#18
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
duration.
he was referring to the intake duration @ .05 216 and the exhaust @ .05 224
seen as 216/224 .551 lift on a 115lsa
you'll hear people describe the lsa being wide, or tight.
tight is lower numerically (109lsa)
wide higher numerically (115 for ex.)
he was referring to the intake duration @ .05 216 and the exhaust @ .05 224
seen as 216/224 .551 lift on a 115lsa
you'll hear people describe the lsa being wide, or tight.
tight is lower numerically (109lsa)
wide higher numerically (115 for ex.)