GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion 2006 & Older Trucks | General Discussion

73-87 C10 trucks with 5" tach

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-07-2006 | 10:08 PM
  #11  
ProStreet83C10's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Default

yeah i suppose...i wanna do a 383 with an 8-71 blower
Old 07-08-2006 | 12:06 PM
  #12  
nightrunner's Avatar
Mr. Obvious
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,006
Likes: 2
From: Manchester, TN
Default

that would be sweet especially with a butterfly scoop sticking through the hood
Old 07-08-2006 | 05:56 PM
  #13  
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

This is the way I will be going. I will be adding a shift light where the factory headlight switch is and running an Autometer Recall Tach. The headlight switch will be moved to the column.
Old 07-08-2006 | 06:10 PM
  #14  
ProStreet83C10's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Default

Originally Posted by nightrunner
bette off to swap ina 400 turbo and be done with it
why would a run a tubo 400 when that takes more HP to run than a turbo 350 lol
Old 07-08-2006 | 06:34 PM
  #15  
nightrunner's Avatar
Mr. Obvious
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,006
Likes: 2
From: Manchester, TN
Default

if you dont do much more to your motor ok... well i dont really know what a turbo 350 will handle but i know a 400 turbo will handle almost anything stock

and it doesnt take hp to run a transmission u just have more parasitic loss in some more than others but i got what you were saying

the point i was making was the 700r4 is crap and will play out and is not worth modifying
Old 07-08-2006 | 06:44 PM
  #16  
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by nightrunner
if you dont do much more to your motor ok... well i dont really know what a turbo 350 will handle but i know a 400 turbo will handle almost anything stock

and it doesnt take hp to run a transmission u just have more parasitic loss in some more than others but i got what you were saying

the point i was making was the 700r4 is crap and will play out and is not worth modifying
He is correct in almost everyway, a TH400 can handle any stock engine, the parasitic loss in a TH400 can be corrected with billet clutch drums, keep in mind they are very expensive. The only thing a 700r4 is good for is a boat anchor , but this is my opinion.

A TH350 will work but you will need a shift kit, good quality clutches, and the biggest cooler you can use; hell this is a must for any tranny.
Old 07-08-2006 | 06:48 PM
  #17  
nightrunner's Avatar
Mr. Obvious
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,006
Likes: 2
From: Manchester, TN
Default

the 87 gmc that i had had a 700r4 and i was just limping along on it when i wrecked the damn truck and this was on a 90k mile 305 tbi all stock with very high pegleg rear gears adn fluid changed when it was supposed to
Old 07-08-2006 | 06:58 PM
  #18  
ProStreet83C10's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Default

mine has seemed to hold up well for me so far...
Old 07-08-2006 | 07:09 PM
  #19  
nightrunner's Avatar
Mr. Obvious
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,006
Likes: 2
From: Manchester, TN
Default

it may do that for you but when it does break it will cost you
Old 07-08-2006 | 07:57 PM
  #20  
ProStreet83C10's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Default

lol ok, lets get back on topic......5" tachs


Quick Reply: 73-87 C10 trucks with 5" tach



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:28 PM.