Notices
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion 2006 & Older Trucks | General Discussion

Lets end the weight misconception

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-29-2010, 09:22 PM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
fastnblu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

There's a lot of possibilities just goin thru that list.
Old 03-29-2010, 09:26 PM
  #12  
I have a gauge for that
iTrader: (42)
 
Atomic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 16,261
Received 391 Likes on 261 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GMCtrk
Most people are full of **** when it comes to weight. No, your truck does not weight 6000lbs. The heaviest half ton vehicle GM makes it the avalanche, at around 5850.
If you are referring to me, I have a certified CAT scale printout that begs to differ. The weights I listed are just guesses to emphasis how a bunch of things add up.
Old 03-29-2010, 09:27 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
fastnblu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Atomic, WOW! I forgot bout the 14 bolt axle. Your truck is a pig, no wonder u needed that Maggie.
Old 03-29-2010, 09:28 PM
  #14  
I have a gauge for that
iTrader: (42)
 
Atomic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 16,261
Received 391 Likes on 261 Posts
Default

haha it definately helps. I could loose a few hundred pounds easy with the speakers, air stuff, and lift, but the tires by far have the biggest effect.
Old 03-29-2010, 09:29 PM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 12,275
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Atomic
If you are referring to me, I have a certified CAT scale printout that begs to differ. The weights I listed are just guesses to emphasis how a bunch of things add up.
I wasn't referring to you. I'm referring to the idiots who think their ext cabs weigh 6000lbs in stock form.
Old 03-29-2010, 09:30 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
sonoma43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saint Joseph, MI
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

5500lb. with me in it. 03 EC Z71
no weight reduction.
Old 03-29-2010, 09:31 PM
  #17  
I have a gauge for that
iTrader: (42)
 
Atomic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 16,261
Received 391 Likes on 261 Posts
Default

ah, I was going to say I wish I was kidding
Old 03-29-2010, 09:31 PM
  #18  
Baltimore Whore
iTrader: (95)
 
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

4379 with me in it(220)
Old 03-29-2010, 09:39 PM
  #19  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
fastnblu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Oh ya, guys w/. 4WD. Those monster size bumpers, extra light kits, winches, nerf bars & step pads hurt bad. I'm sure those guys know, but they didn't put em on for wtg. but function.
Us 2WD guys don't have to worry bout any of that.
Old 03-29-2010, 09:40 PM
  #20  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
RedHot04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default hmmm

Originally Posted by 00ChevyScott
I have seen weight #'s here all over the board, and each person claims their scale is certified blah blah blah whatever. My question is, how can there be such a huge fluctuation in race weights?

I know the difference between 2wd and 4wd is quite a bit (maybe 800 lbs?), but some of these numbers people throw out are 5800+, while others are low 4000's or even in the 39XX range.

I also know that many people do weight reduction, but with the kind of reduction most people on here do, there shouldn't be more than 1 or 200 lbs difference +/-

Is there a definitive answer for each trucks weight other than subtracting payload capacity from the GVW? Last time I weighed my truck at the track, it was around 4500lbs with half a tank of gas.
definitive answer Already been answered...
Whatever your question actually is... Weight to Power--or--Power to Weight ratio is the answer.

You can get beat at the track by an ATV or a mini dragster if you think about it. But would you tell the story?

From Wikipedia
Power-to-weight ratio (or specific power or power-to-mass ratio) is a calculation commonly applied to engines and mobile power sources to enable the comparison of one unit or design to another. Power-to-weight ratio is a measurement of actual performance of any engine or power sources. It is also used as a measurement of performance of a vehicle as a whole, with the engine's power output being divided by the weight (or mass) of the vehicle, to give a metric that is independent of the vehicle's size.

The inverse of power-to-weight, weight-to-power ratio (power loading) is a calculation commonly applied to aircraft, cars, and vehicles in general, to enable the comparison of one vehicle performance to another. Weight-to-power ratio is a measurement of the acceleration capability (potential) of any land vehicle or climb performance of any aircraft or space vehicle.


Quick Reply: Lets end the weight misconception



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:14 PM.