Notices
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion 2006 & Older Trucks | General Discussion

My NNBS impressions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-14-2007, 04:43 PM
  #1  
Admin
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
03sierraslt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Western PA
Posts: 19,004
Received 217 Likes on 173 Posts
Default My NNBS impressions

Ok here is the story, my work truck (F450) is in the shop for repairs so the dealer gave me a 08 Siverado as a loaner. Its the first NNBS I have driven. Its a ECSB 4+4 4.8L with 3.42 rear. So far I am rather dissapointed, the mileage seems pretty shitty considering the lack of get up and go. It has no nuts unless you put it too the floor. I like the brakes they are very responsive and the steering is nice it feels like a more aggressive steering ratio. I like the new guage cluster, big and easy to read yet tastefull IMO. I am not a fan of the radio controls at all. For being so slow it sure does like to spin allot ( open rear diff.) its been rainy so I found myself using autotrac allot. Maybe I am just too used to my AWD. There is allot of room under the hood for mods It seems to ride about the same as my truck, maybe a bit softer then mine. ( but mine is lowered some with 20's) So anyway for anyone whom is interested that is my take on the NNBS trucks.
Old 11-14-2007, 05:37 PM
  #2  
Piss Pumps for Sale
iTrader: (5)
 
Chevy Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada, The True North Strong and Free!
Posts: 2,685
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 03sierraslt
Ok here is the story, my work truck (F450) is in the shop for repairs so the dealer gave me a 08 Siverado as a loaner. Its the first NNBS I have driven. Its a ECSB 4+4 4.8L with 3.42 rear. So far I am rather dissapointed, the mileage seems pretty shitty considering the lack of get up and go. It has no nuts unless you put it too the floor. I like the brakes they are very responsive and the steering is nice it feels like a more aggressive steering ratio. I like the new guage cluster, big and easy to read yet tastefull IMO. I am not a fan of the radio controls at all. For being so slow it sure does like to spin allot ( open rear diff.) its been rainy so I found myself using autotrac allot. Maybe I am just too used to my AWD. There is allot of room under the hood for mods It seems to ride about the same as my truck, maybe a bit softer then mine. ( but mine is lowered some with 20's) So anyway for anyone whom is interested that is my take on the NNBS trucks.

I gotta disagree with the poor gas mileage, my dad has a new ecsb 4x4 with the 4.8 and it get very decent mileage, averages 15 litres per 100kms not sure the mpg and thats like 90% city driving, also its gutless because of the shat loads of torque management, I think they boosted the amount of torque management on the NNBS, then again your use to driving a 6.0 with a ton of mods VS a bonestock 4.8
Old 11-14-2007, 06:02 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
mdwatts11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Deigo, CA
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chevy Cowboy
I gotta disagree with the poor gas mileage, my dad has a new ecsb 4x4 with the 4.8 and it get very decent mileage, averages 15 litres per 100kms not sure the mpg and thats like 90% city driving, also its gutless because of the shat loads of torque management, I think they boosted the amount of torque management on the NNBS, then again your use to driving a 6.0 with a ton of mods VS a bonestock 4.8
Thats 15.68 miles per gallon, in case you were wondering I get around 15.9 city. Once you get more miles on these NNBS, the more they open up power wise, and the better gas mileage you get.
Old 11-14-2007, 06:04 PM
  #4  
Piss Pumps for Sale
iTrader: (5)
 
Chevy Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada, The True North Strong and Free!
Posts: 2,685
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

hmmm that doesnt sound right lol, let me figure out what I did wrong, ok I cant figure out what I did wrong, you sure your calculations are right? my dad calcualted his a while back in mpg and he was getting around 22-24 mpg average
Old 11-14-2007, 06:16 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
mdwatts11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Deigo, CA
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Well you convert the liters to gallons, which turns out to be 3.96253g then find the distance, by converting 100 km to miles which is 62.13712 miles, then just divide miles by the gallons. That gives you 15.68mi/g
Old 11-14-2007, 06:32 PM
  #6  
Admin
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
03sierraslt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Western PA
Posts: 19,004
Received 217 Likes on 173 Posts
Default

I know they have a **** load of TM, also the PE delay in the tune is something retarded like 4 or 5 sec plus 5k rpm min. As to the fuel mileage I would say based on my estimate its got like 15-16mpg and thats been mostly highway. Hell my truck gets that, mine also has 4.10 gears. Difference is mine gets like 8-9mpg city, where as I bet this 4.8 gets alot better in the city.
Old 11-15-2007, 06:26 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
 
Bo185's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Beebe, Arkansas
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Its the tune. They went very conservative on it. I guess so they didn't' eat transmission cost on the 100,000 mile warranty's! But I liked the ride on the new trucks but hated the HVAC controls as well as the radio, I had to look away from the road to adjust things and they were small.
Old 11-15-2007, 06:27 AM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Allgonoshow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

my 6.0 gets the same milage as my 04 5.3 did
Old 11-15-2007, 06:55 AM
  #9  
On The Tree
 
fatdog41's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am on my 5th. tank. Checked it and it was 18.69 mpg. Combo highway/city. 5.3. Better than my '03 4.8.
Old 11-15-2007, 08:22 AM
  #10  
Admin
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
03sierraslt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Western PA
Posts: 19,004
Received 217 Likes on 173 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fatdog41
I am on my 5th. tank. Checked it and it was 18.69 mpg. Combo highway/city. 5.3. Better than my '03 4.8.
Is yours 2 or 4x4?


Quick Reply: My NNBS impressions



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:15 AM.