OK I`ll bite LSx for a Torquer instead of a BBC.
#1
OK I`ll bite LSx for a Torquer instead of a BBC.
Going back to this recent thread; Educating me on the merits of the LSx engines.
https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...=432189&page=2
You folks made some great arguments on the LSx vs. BBC.
Understanding the advantage of the more modern technology of the LSx series.
How would you make a low rpm torque monster for towing ? NA only no FI.
Say 2000 rpm cruise with 7000 in tow ?
https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...=432189&page=2
You folks made some great arguments on the LSx vs. BBC.
Understanding the advantage of the more modern technology of the LSx series.
How would you make a low rpm torque monster for towing ? NA only no FI.
Say 2000 rpm cruise with 7000 in tow ?
#3
I don't get all this BB talk, if you want an "easy" big cube swap, go LSX with ~440 cubes and still leave room for a rebuild. Lots of cubes and still have room to rebore later. I think upwards of 480+ cubes is possible on the standard deck height for N/A. IMO
#4
Or go with the tall deck.
4.25 bore and 4.50 stroke and you've got your 572!
You could still use your stock ignition and computer system. Not sure what they are doing with the intake on a tall deck. The LS7 with custom spacer plates or a sheet metal i'd imagine. Remember, there is no water going through the intake and the valley has it's own cover as well.
http://www.gmperformanceparts.com/En...6454&engCat=ls
4.25 bore and 4.50 stroke and you've got your 572!
You could still use your stock ignition and computer system. Not sure what they are doing with the intake on a tall deck. The LS7 with custom spacer plates or a sheet metal i'd imagine. Remember, there is no water going through the intake and the valley has it's own cover as well.
http://www.gmperformanceparts.com/En...6454&engCat=ls
#6
Baltimore Whore
iTrader: (95)
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 2
From: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
im not saying in all cases but most, esp for street apps, even smaller cubic inch, can atain what a carb BBC can make, do it more efficiently.. As you have seen the lsx is a bad *** motor, hard to beat..
#7
Or go with the tall deck.
4.25 bore and 4.50 stroke and you've got your 572!
You could still use your stock ignition and computer system. Not sure what they are doing with the intake on a tall deck. The LS7 with custom spacer plates or a sheet metal i'd imagine. Remember, there is no water going through the intake and the valley has it's own cover as well.
http://www.gmperformanceparts.com/En...6454&engCat=ls
4.25 bore and 4.50 stroke and you've got your 572!
You could still use your stock ignition and computer system. Not sure what they are doing with the intake on a tall deck. The LS7 with custom spacer plates or a sheet metal i'd imagine. Remember, there is no water going through the intake and the valley has it's own cover as well.
http://www.gmperformanceparts.com/En...6454&engCat=ls
I can make up LS7 spacer plates.
Using the stock ignition/ECU would be a plus.
Did see the LSX454 also. Wonder if there would be room for a longer arm and a bit of bore ?
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
omc8
Central & Northern
0
08-10-2015 10:39 PM