GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion 2006 & Older Trucks | General Discussion

Stock 2WD 6.0 LQ9 Crew Cab 1/4 Mile times

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2006 | 03:39 PM
  #11  
getchusum99's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
From: Baton rouge ,LA
Default

My Freinds Bone Stock 200 Silvy Ext Cab Step Side With A 5.3 Ran A 15.7 Consistantly At State Capitol Dragway
Old 04-10-2006 | 03:24 PM
  #12  
1TRUESS's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,557
Likes: 0
From: Pickerington, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by Billiumss
My buddy has a 2000 5.3 Extended cab, completely stock he did 16.1.

I sure hope the LQ9 that I am getting will do mid to low 15's...

I'll be taking my new truck to Norwalk on May 12th
I will see you there!
Old 04-10-2006 | 03:40 PM
  #13  
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,271
Likes: 0
From: Katy, TX
Default

How heavy are those 2wd QC's? I'd guess 15.5@91 stock.
Old 04-10-2006 | 10:26 PM
  #14  
83 Chevy's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Idaho
Default

I would think you would run an almost identical time to a 2WD SS truck if you have the extended cab 2WD. Slightly slower for a crew cab (maybe 2 tenths for 1/4 mile).

If you have the 4WD VMAX, I would say you are right in there with the AWD SS truck. You can always run in 4 high or auto to drive all 4 wheels - you have that option. I have not needed it however.

The 2WD SS trucks now run 3.73 gears, but are lighter. The AWD SS trucks ran 4.10 gears but were 250 pounds or so heavier.

Both trucks run almost identical 1/4 mile times. Truck Trend magazine ran both SS's. The 2WD ran a 15.1 and the AWD ran a 14.99. 0-60 on the 2WD was 6.7 seconds and 6.6 for the AWD.

Car and Driver tested the AWD SS with a time of 6.3 seconds to 60, and 14.8 for the 1/4. I am sure they corrected for weather/altitude.

Anyway, the VMAX's run the same motor as the SS trucks, but the stronger 4L70E transmission with identical ratios. The weight difference is less than 20 pounds between a comparably equipped SS and VMAX truck.

Just some info to digest

Mike
Old 04-11-2006 | 08:56 PM
  #15  
FastCrewCab4x4's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: Blaine, TN
Default

I would guess that the short tube headers, Predator, and High flow air intake would make my LQ4(4WD) about as powerful as a stock LQ9, and I think it would run a good bit better than a 16. it's never been to the track but Damn what Beast when it comes to passing somebody. between Like 40 & 100+ MPH it Friggin rocks for such a big truck, I Like It & Now I want More Hear that???? Custom tune Comin in, SweeeeeeeT, Peace Out, Mike.
Old 04-11-2006 | 09:12 PM
  #16  
three83's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
From: Lafayette, Louisiana
Default

I never ran my 5.3 Crew Cab when it was stock but after Predator Tune, Volant and AeroChamber I ran 15.2 @90.9. I don't think my truck was a 16 second truck stock but it was a high 15 second truck. So I would say a mid to low 15's for the same truck with a 6.0
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Staggered 02
Western
8
08-11-2015 07:54 AM
FlowmasterMufflers
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
0
07-17-2015 03:26 PM
fcompean
FORCED INDUCTION
21
07-15-2015 09:55 PM
Nimoryan
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
0
07-05-2015 03:50 PM
supersportsteve
New Members
0
07-04-2015 12:02 PM



Quick Reply: Stock 2WD 6.0 LQ9 Crew Cab 1/4 Mile times



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:40 PM.