Notices
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion 2006 & Older Trucks | General Discussion

Why no LS1 based V-6?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-19-2007, 02:28 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
Bo185's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Beebe, Arkansas
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Why no LS1 based V-6?

Why hasn't GM made a LS base V-6 by removing the front two cylinders? I think it would make more power and get better mileage than the 4.3.

I think they could make 300HP V-6.

But with the 4.3 still going strong guess its cheaper just to freshin' it up!

Ah well who wants a V-6 anyway!
Old 01-19-2007, 03:35 PM
  #2  
Import Moderator
iTrader: (52)
 
beastmode's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 7,041
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i think the 4.3 is a terrible motor to be honest wit you, the only thing i think they got goin for them is durability... stock they put out no power unless its in a S10 or blazer, and the mpg is TERRIBLE on em, i get better mpg in my 4.8 then i did in my 4.3. of course my 4.3 was 4wd wit 33s on it
Old 01-19-2007, 04:09 PM
  #3  
Mr. Obvious
iTrader: (4)
 
nightrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manchester, TN
Posts: 6,006
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

i think right now they are working on converting over to DOHC v6 engines with more power and less displacement

i agree with beastmode on that one they have horrible power( whoever decided to put a v-6 in a FS truck should be shot), very poor gas mileage for a v-6( i had a 2wd rcsb on stock tires, get better mileage with my 4.8 on 20s), but are durable.
Old 01-19-2007, 09:38 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
stone150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I read another book OMG, but it says when the the first ls1 came up they got quite a few of the ideas and designs from an experimental v6 that GM was working on, but it never was produced
Old 01-19-2007, 10:41 PM
  #5  
Un-Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
mcfarlnd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,318
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

thats interesting
Old 01-19-2007, 10:42 PM
  #6  
Un-Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
mcfarlnd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,318
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

what book
Old 01-20-2007, 12:30 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
SBTork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LaCrosse, WI
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

my v6 isn't too bad......until I step on the gas, then it makes me depressed. It's a good daily driver which is what I need, but I cannot wait to step up to an LQ9 in a few years. And yes I have to defend the v6 because I own one.
Old 01-20-2007, 01:42 AM
  #8  
Un-Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
mcfarlnd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,318
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Old 01-20-2007, 07:36 AM
  #9  
Import Moderator
iTrader: (52)
 
beastmode's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 7,041
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SBTork
my v6 isn't too bad......until I step on the gas, then it makes me depressed. It's a good daily driver which is what I need, but I cannot wait to step up to an LQ9 in a few years. And yes I have to defend the v6 because I own one.
i owned one too. and trust me the last thing i wanted to do was bash something that i own but even when i was driving it everyday i still realized it suck mpg wise. even the S10s and blazers dont get that good of mpg when you look at how small they are
Old 01-20-2007, 07:05 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
SBTork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LaCrosse, WI
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by beastmode
i owned one too. and trust me the last thing i wanted to do was bash something that i own but even when i was driving it everyday i still realized it suck mpg wise. even the S10s and blazers dont get that good of mpg when you look at how small they are
very true. I guess I am doing ok with mine, about 19 combined with 70% or so in the city. But mine is new and a 5 speed as well. I have been hearing a lot in the past few years about it's crappy fuel mileage capabilities. Oh well, ill just continue dreaming about the LQ9 until I can actually afford one.


Quick Reply: Why no LS1 based V-6?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:32 AM.