Working on Video of 10sec SS Silverado.....
#1
Working on Video of 10sec SS Silverado.....
My buddy just got done with his SS. He just got it back from the shop and these are his mods AND track time....
2003 Silverado SS with Ram Air intake, cut outs (Plated up because of the Tubo) .212-220 comp cam. 150 wet shot, stage 2 lingeinfeilter heads, 3600 yank, westers tune, STS turbo @ 14psi, descreen MAF, 2/4 lowering, Electric Fans, 26in Lexani's (drag on different tires and rims) shaved tailgate and door handles. 624rwhp 701ftlbs. Best run in 1/4 mile 10.85 @ 134.25mph
I think he's ready for PARISH.....
2003 Silverado SS with Ram Air intake, cut outs (Plated up because of the Tubo) .212-220 comp cam. 150 wet shot, stage 2 lingeinfeilter heads, 3600 yank, westers tune, STS turbo @ 14psi, descreen MAF, 2/4 lowering, Electric Fans, 26in Lexani's (drag on different tires and rims) shaved tailgate and door handles. 624rwhp 701ftlbs. Best run in 1/4 mile 10.85 @ 134.25mph
I think he's ready for PARISH.....
#3
12 Second Truck Club
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WTF?? Why don't I know about this truck????
Bah! I want details, details details!! Where does he post at?
Wait, 134mph on only 600rwhp?? That doesn't sound right for a 5000lb truck. 650rwhp should only be getting maybe 120 or so I thought.
Bah! I want details, details details!! Where does he post at?
Wait, 134mph on only 600rwhp?? That doesn't sound right for a 5000lb truck. 650rwhp should only be getting maybe 120 or so I thought.
Trending Topics
#9
12 Second Truck Club
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Scream
Something's just not adding up. Don't SS's weigh close to 5500 pounds? Would 624hp be enough to push a truck to 134mph traps?
Something doesn't sound right I agree..
#10
single digit dreamer
iTrader: (6)
here is what i get
me
You Entered:
Vehicle Weight - 4800 (lbs)
Trap Speed - 123 (mph)
Drivetrain Loss - 20 (%)
Results:
Rear Wheel HP - 606.5
Crankshaft HP - 758.1
Power to Weight (rwhp) - 7.9 (lower is better)
Power to Weight (crank hp) - 6.3 (lower is better)
him
You Entered:
Vehicle Weight - 5300 (lbs)
Trap Speed - 134 (mph)
Drivetrain Loss - 20 (%)
Results:
Rear Wheel HP - 865.9
Crankshaft HP - 1082.4
Power to Weight (rwhp) - 6.1 (lower is better)
Power to Weight (crank hp) - 4.9 (lower is better)
the numbers match for me, they dont look so good for him? seems a little odd to me. lets see the vid!!
me
You Entered:
Vehicle Weight - 4800 (lbs)
Trap Speed - 123 (mph)
Drivetrain Loss - 20 (%)
Results:
Rear Wheel HP - 606.5
Crankshaft HP - 758.1
Power to Weight (rwhp) - 7.9 (lower is better)
Power to Weight (crank hp) - 6.3 (lower is better)
him
You Entered:
Vehicle Weight - 5300 (lbs)
Trap Speed - 134 (mph)
Drivetrain Loss - 20 (%)
Results:
Rear Wheel HP - 865.9
Crankshaft HP - 1082.4
Power to Weight (rwhp) - 6.1 (lower is better)
Power to Weight (crank hp) - 4.9 (lower is better)
the numbers match for me, they dont look so good for him? seems a little odd to me. lets see the vid!!