Working on Video of 10sec SS Silverado.....
11-09-2004, 06:30 PM
#32
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Somewhere between Auburn, AL and Columbus, GA
Posts: 1,288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DUNGBEETLE
No thats without the Wet shot!
. 
11-09-2004, 06:31 PM
#35
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Somewhere between Auburn, AL and Columbus, GA
Posts: 1,288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TurboBerserker
Yes on the first thing. Reverse splits aren't necessary, but are definitely more popular, and cam companies are now saying they don't make a difference. I'm not using one.
11-09-2004, 06:32 PM
#36
TECH Regular
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sacramento California
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BeefTip
So he is making around 775 rwhp with no internal engine upgrades, now that pretty ******* impressive. Where did he buy that truck at cause im getting one at that dealership.
I want one too.
11-09-2004, 06:34 PM
#38
Originally Posted by BeefTip
Hey, the split he had just looked like a good one for nitrous/supercharger.
My cam is 230/236 .600/.600 114lsa, for instance.
11-09-2004, 06:39 PM
#40
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Somewhere between Auburn, AL and Columbus, GA
Posts: 1,288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TurboBerserker
You are right. You are also right about the reverse split being the "turbo way". It's just not what the cam companies are still saying.
My cam is 230/236 .600/.600 114lsa, for instance.
My cam is 230/236 .600/.600 114lsa, for instance.