Notices
GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion 2007 - 2013 Trucks | General Discussion

3.73's vs 4.10s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-23-2007, 11:14 PM
  #1  
6600 rpm clutch dump of death Administrator
Thread Starter
 
J-Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 3.73's vs 4.10s

I'm looking at a couple of Vmax Crewcabs. Both 2wd and 4wd right now. Most have 3.73's and one has 4.10s. Just wondering what kind of fuel mileage difference one sees with 4.10s vs the 3.73's. My daily commute is 55 miles one way (so 110 total).


I'm hoping with the AFM and a bit of tuning that I can get the mileage up to a better. I'm just wondering how much the 4wd eats up compared to 2wd, and how much the 4.10 eat up vs the 3.73's.

I'd like to at least be close to where my ECSB 2006 4.8L is for daily mileage.
Old 12-23-2007, 11:21 PM
  #2  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (47)
 
Stangkilr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You really wont see any difference. LSX motors love cruising at around 2500rpms.
Old 12-24-2007, 10:14 AM
  #3  
Teching In
 
200kSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The BEST I've ever gotten with my 07 Vmax CC/SB 4WD with 3.73's is 16.3 highway driving like a grandma. Do NOT believe that 19mpg on the window sticker. Realistically you're looking at 15mpg on the highway. Less if you have a heavy right foot.
Old 12-24-2007, 10:55 AM
  #4  
On The Tree
 
Vmax2007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have heard that 4.10's can actually net better freeway mileage than 3.73's on the AFM engines due to the higher RPMs allowing the 4-mode to stay enabled more at cruising speed. I have the 3.73's in my Vmax and the 4-mode is NEVER enabled at any speed above 65-70mph and even at 60 mph it only will activate on completely flat highway on cruise or when decelerating. If I were to do it again, I would have gotten the 4.10's.

16 mpg freeway is a good number too. The best I have netted on a single 150 mile trip was 18, but that was about 30% freeway at 70 mph and 70% country highway at 55-60mph driving like I am checking mileage...LOL The only stop-n-go driving was a few small towns I had to go through.
Old 12-27-2007, 06:15 PM
  #5  
TECH Resident
 
MNC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

16.3 on the highway? Before I put the cam in (with AFM) the VMax would easily get 22mpg on a tank of pure Highway driving. I had tuned it to hold the 4cyl mode at higher speeds and MAP.

With the new cam my guess would be around 18-19 and mine is a 4wd truck.
Old 01-10-2008, 04:39 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Y2KLimited's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have 3.73's in the sub if I didn't take it out of stock and was doing it again it'd definetely be 4.10's
Old 02-16-2008, 10:47 PM
  #7  
Staging Lane
 
2500ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: louisiana/colorado
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

go with the 4.10s there want be much diff
Old 08-09-2008, 12:27 AM
  #8  
jsk
Teching In
 
jsk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: nashville,tn
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Looking at a chart on ratios, about 150 rpms at 60 MPH.
Old 08-09-2008, 08:47 PM
  #9  
TECH Veteran
 
Mr. Sandog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sun Diego
Posts: 4,632
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stangkilr
You really wont see any difference. LSX motors love cruising at around 2500rpms.
LSx motors may love 2500 RPM, but at that engine speed they are gulping the gas. LSx engines get their best mileage at 1600-1800 RPM.

Whatever combination of transmission gearing, rear-end gears, and tire height gives you ~1800 RPM is what you want.

In my Avalanche, I replaced the stock 3.73's with 4.10's and experienced a loss of 2 mpg across the board.
Old 08-10-2008, 09:49 PM
  #10  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
jimmyboy8301's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

before i lifted mine i was averaging 13.5 with 4.10's


Quick Reply: 3.73's vs 4.10s



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:31 AM.