6.2 vs 2011duramax vs 2011f250 vs tuned 6.2
#11
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (25)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
From: Katy & College Station, TX
My 06lbz dmax with an efi tune on 35s with a full toolbox and fifth wheel hitch in the bed ran 14.9@90. Similar trucks without the weight and tires run low 14s, high 13s. There have been quite a few who have been guys who have ran mid 13s on stock transmissions with nothing more than a tune.
i think all the trucks are impressive IMO, especially considering they are all so damn heavy. the Ford mileage sounds I'll be looking forward to the videos!
#12
My 06lbz dmax with an efi tune on 35s with a full toolbox and fifth wheel hitch in the bed ran 14.9@90. Similar trucks without the weight and tires run low 14s, high 13s. There have been quite a few who have been guys who have ran mid 13s on stock transmissions with nothing more than a tune.
#13
Ive yet to see a tune only 4wd or even 2wd L92 truck run a mid 13 tune only. Either way its a fairly mute point as theyre all plenty faster than the trucks offered by the other manufacturers
#16
I am the one with the stock 6.2 and before it i had a 2003 regular cab z71 tuned and outran the f250 by about a length or so. So either ur 5.3 is sick or the f250 has a giant tune, and i still dont see that happening.
#19
I have a gauge for that
iTrader: (42)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,266
Likes: 394
From: Huntsville, AL
I do have a converter, and of course stock they arent much as is the case with any diesel, but throw $500 at them and they are fast as ****. And no I wasnt catching him, look at the trap speeds, he is putting down way more power than I am, even the 2000lb weight difference doesnt make up for it.