GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion 2007 - 2013 Trucks | General Discussion

6.2 w/ bolt ons ,,,, track times

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-14-2011 | 10:03 AM
  #11  
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
From: Williamsport,in
Default

Yeah weight is just guess. Prolly 2 heavy

Added weight:
Air lift load leveling kit. ( for boat)
2 car seats
Big camper mirrors
Factory step bars
Tonnua cover
Rubber bed mat
Huskey floor mats front n back. Covers middle hump also

I'm sure that might b extra 200lbs though

Thanks for kind words. I was very happy with times

Needed a baseline before Whipple install

Last edited by John Deere racer; 03-14-2011 at 02:54 PM.
Old 03-14-2011 | 11:17 AM
  #12  
double047's Avatar
14 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Not bad man, considering weight, etc.

Keep up the good work!
Old 03-14-2011 | 11:49 AM
  #13  
NKPPhil's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
Default

Agree - not bad with that extra weight. That's the kind of "baseline" that can make a guy smile with anticipation! Whipple ...
Old 03-14-2011 | 05:35 PM
  #14  
slammed89swb's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: Seabrook Tx
Default

Originally Posted by GMCtrk



BTW, the times are good given actual weight probably closer to 54-500lbs.
Dude that **** is funny...... hopefully nobody got their feelings hurt
Old 03-14-2011 | 08:38 PM
  #15  
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
From: Williamsport,in
Default

How are these times compared to 2wd models
Old 03-14-2011 | 08:42 PM
  #16  
1slow01Z71's Avatar
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 4
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by GMCtrk



BTW, the times are good given actual weight probably closer to 54-500lbs.
Not mad in the least, I just feel bad for the guys who want to talk about their 6.2s and get hijacked by keniff posting about his 6.2. Its always the same post too, I think he has it saved in a word document so he can just copy and paste it. Keniffs times are decent but by far not great, AP2002 runs 12.3s with a millled head LQ4 with the same size converter and about the same size cam but has a smaller motor, and crappier heads but runs half a second faster.

For the original poster, those are some damn respectable times given the setup. One of these days once the wife doesnt need a new damn vehicle every 6 months maybe Ill be able to buy me a 6.2 cc 4wd. They seem to run so well with relatively few mods and I love the interior of the NNBS ltzs
Old 03-14-2011 | 09:23 PM
  #17  
slammed89swb's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: Seabrook Tx
Default

That's funny you say that about kens times, i am noticing he is only a few tenths fast than the tuned 6.2's.....i can't imagine having a beefy 4x4 running that strong,nice times for sure.
Old 03-14-2011 | 09:54 PM
  #18  
iamkeniff's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,365
Likes: 3
From: Gonzales, la
Default

Originally Posted by 1slow01Z71
Not mad in the least, I just feel bad for the guys who want to talk about their 6.2s and get hijacked by keniff posting about his 6.2. Its always the same post too, I think he has it saved in a word document so he can just copy and paste it. Keniffs times are decent but by far not great, AP2002 runs 12.3s with a millled head LQ4 with the same size converter and about the same size cam but has a smaller motor, and crappier heads but runs half a second faster.
it was a simple mistake. i misread the title, simple as that. an no its not saved, it was typed out. ah well hint taken no one cares no problem. also the same converter? im on a stock 6L80e converter. i deleted the post for you so what more do you want?
Old 03-14-2011 | 10:17 PM
  #19  
1slow01Z71's Avatar
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 4
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by iamkeniff
it was a simple mistake. i misread the title, simple as that. an no its not saved, it was typed out. ah well hint taken no one cares no problem. also the same converter? im on a stock 6L80e converter. i deleted the post for you so what more do you want?
I was comparing your 12.7 or 12.8 time that was on a 3600 covnerter with a 60e, didnt feel it was a fair comparison between his 60e times and your 80e times with different converters. Dont want anything, I was simply explaining that I wasnt mad and why I responded the way I did. My initial response was definitely a bit coarse and I apologize for that, today was my 15th day straight of work, was at the jobsite at 2am after 2 hours of sleep so apparently Im cranky.
Old 03-14-2011 | 10:34 PM
  #20  
silverado1ss89's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 576
Likes: 1
From: LOS ANGELES, CA
Default

Good stuff.. Keep up the good work everybody... 6.2 times are a killer.. Can't believe seeing one of those heavy truck smashing on jeep srt8.. Trailblazer ss.. Hopefully trucks will be more respected


Quick Reply: 6.2 w/ bolt ons ,,,, track times



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 AM.