Notices
GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion 2007 - 2013 Trucks | General Discussion

Another GM engine that's winning, lol.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-16-2011, 09:34 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
1994Vmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,636
Received 103 Likes on 74 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1FastBrick
I'd like to know... While I here postive things about the 6.2L output, I also hear about Oil pressure issues with these.
Me too. It always ran fine when I drove it and did for this other guy too until one day. Not a steady degradation of any kind which leads to a failure. The oil pressure is puzzling though but a lifter or wiped cam lobe I am sure would do that. You don't see that many non AFM ones have catastrophic failure so I really would like to see what happened to this one. I promise I will update once we know actually what happened. Too bad it's a warranty deal as I wouldn't mind getting the engine from the truck to build a stroker from.
Old 12-16-2011, 09:38 PM
  #12  
Custm2500's Rude Friend
iTrader: (17)
 
1FastBrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: JunkYard
Posts: 14,391
Received 786 Likes on 652 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1994Vmax
Me too. It always ran fine when I drove it and did for this other guy too until one day. Not a steady degradation of any kind which leads to a failure. The oil pressure is puzzling though but a lifter or wiped cam lobe I am sure would do that. You don't see that many non AFM ones have catastrophic failure so I really would like to see what happened to this one. I promise I will update once we know actually what happened. Too bad it's a warranty deal as I wouldn't mind getting the engine from the truck to build a stroker from.
Would Be nice depending on the damage and the cause of Failure assuming it's doomed and not repairable under warranty.

I am wondering if there is a design flaw in the oiling system thats adding to the failures.
Old 12-20-2011, 09:32 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
1994Vmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,636
Received 103 Likes on 74 Posts
Default

The only update thus far is the engine is being torn down at the dealer and a lifter failure is one of it's problems. The extent of the damage to the engine in the truck is not known yet however for sure. Did one just simply collapse or did one manage to turn and wipe the cam, that I don't know yet!
Old 12-21-2011, 01:45 AM
  #14  
Custm2500's Rude Friend
iTrader: (17)
 
1FastBrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: JunkYard
Posts: 14,391
Received 786 Likes on 652 Posts
Default

Nice....
Old 12-21-2011, 05:33 AM
  #15  
Teching In
 
ITSAGAS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Uh, wouldn't this motor be a 6.0 not a 6.2?
Old 12-21-2011, 04:02 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
1994Vmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,636
Received 103 Likes on 74 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by itsagas
uh, wouldn't this motor be a 6.0 not a 6.2?
LY6 = 6.0 Liter, Iron Block, L92 Heads, No AFM.

Last edited by 1994Vmax; 12-21-2011 at 05:11 PM.
Old 12-22-2011, 06:54 AM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
TXSZ66AVLANCHE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,920
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Last week I tore down a LY6 with 182K for persistent random misfire and ticking, a couple of the intake valves had enough carbon build up to keep the valves from fully closing.
Old 12-22-2011, 10:39 AM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
1994Vmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,636
Received 103 Likes on 74 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TXSZ66AVLANCHE
Last week I tore down a LY6 with 182K for persistent random misfire and ticking, a couple of the intake valves had enough carbon build up to keep the valves from fully closing.
Not surprising as in factory trim these engines run pig rich all the time. I thought the old LQ4's were bad for black sooty build-up above or aft of the tailpipe but these 07 ups took that to a whole new level. Then the mileage they get reflects that as well. A decent tune would probably make a world of difference there.

Either way I might call the trucks driver sometime this afternoon and see if he has heard anything new about the truck from the dealership. I want to know why a lifter imploded, lol.
Old 12-22-2011, 11:50 PM
  #19  
TECH Enthusiast
 
01silvy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 665
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

My instructor when i was going to school in GM's ASEP program told me they run them rich to help with emissions somehow.. Im not sure why they do that though.. I'm intrested to see what the outcome is with the truck though.
Old 12-23-2011, 08:12 AM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Running it a bit rich at WOT helps keep combustion chamber temps down, which reduces NOx emissions, but it also helps keep the piston and exhaust valves cooler. You have to remember that these engines/trucks are designed to pull a full weight trailer up the side of a mountain in 100* heat, without failure.

As for the carboned up valves...I'd say that's from oil leaking past the valve seals, not because of a rich A/F mix.


Quick Reply: Another GM engine that's winning, lol.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:23 AM.