GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion 2007 - 2013 Trucks | General Discussion

Getting her fixed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-07-2012 | 08:13 PM
  #1  
62nalide's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 2
From: Dallas TX
Default Getting her fixed

well for now im going to put new stock pistons and lower the boost for now any ideas on a stroker? 408, 414, or 418? throw some ideas at me guys dont wanna go too crazy maybe hit the 700rwhp mark and call it for a daily/strip fun truck
Old 02-07-2012 | 08:17 PM
  #2  
tiffo60's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 1
From: Fort Worth
Default

Originally Posted by 62nalide
well for now im going to put new stock pistons and lower the boost for now any ideas on a stroker? 408, 414, or 418? throw some ideas at me guys dont wanna go too crazy maybe hit the 700rwhp mark and call it for a daily/strip fun truck
Keep the cubes low, no real need for large cubes when you're boosted
Old 02-07-2012 | 08:38 PM
  #3  
Atomic's Avatar
I have a gauge for that
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,266
Likes: 394
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

I disagree when you want some serious torque without having to rev higher. The gen4 based blocks have longer sleeves anyway so definately do a stroker. I vote 402 to keep the walls as thick as possible. Lot of piston choices in 4.005"
Old 02-07-2012 | 08:39 PM
  #4  
BlackGMC's Avatar
Resident Retard
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 17,216
Likes: 20
From: Fort Worth - TX
Default

i say stock rebuild with forged pistons...
Old 02-07-2012 | 08:40 PM
  #5  
pewterliftedz's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

its a 6.2 so probably closer to a 414. i say run some 4.065 forged pistons with the factory crank and rods...
Old 02-07-2012 | 09:10 PM
  #6  
62nalide's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 2
From: Dallas TX
Default

Ok ok so I'm guessing aluminum vs cast iron right???
Old 02-07-2012 | 09:35 PM
  #7  
01PewterWS6's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 576
Likes: 1
From: DFW, TX
Default

I say throw a low mileage 5.3 in it and crank up the boost
If it lets go again, another $800 swap and roll on. The 4.8/5.3s seem to be holding with decent boost/numbers.
Old 02-07-2012 | 09:44 PM
  #8  
62nalide's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 2
From: Dallas TX
Default

Originally Posted by 01PewterWS6
I say throw a low mileage 5.3 in it and crank up the boost
If it lets go again, another $800 swap and roll on. The 4.8/5.3s seem to be holding with decent boost/numbers.
Sounds like a plan but I'd like to get a built motor this time around I'm down 2 6.2s now
Old 02-07-2012 | 09:50 PM
  #9  
BlackGMC's Avatar
Resident Retard
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 17,216
Likes: 20
From: Fort Worth - TX
Default

Wow you have killed 2 of them??? Man are you running a safe or agressive tune?
Old 02-07-2012 | 09:52 PM
  #10  
62nalide's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 2
From: Dallas TX
Default

Originally Posted by BlackGMC
Wow you have killed 2 of them??? Man are you running a safe or agressive tune?
Safe tune but I didn't run a fuel additive on a very could weather first one gave out at 717rwhp


Quick Reply: Getting her fixed



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:30 AM.