GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion 2007 - 2013 Trucks | General Discussion

Low, almost no backpressure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-12-2009 | 10:48 AM
  #21  
iamkeniff's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,365
Likes: 3
From: Gonzales, la
Default

mine sucks off the line it doesnt really pick up until 35 or so.
i think the biggest you should go on a N/A motor would be 3" unless you go duals then id go down to 2.5". if that makes sense. turboed mmmm 4"-5"
Old 07-12-2009 | 11:59 AM
  #22  
Spoolin's Avatar
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,870
Likes: 4
From: Here and sometimes there too.
Default

Originally Posted by iamkeniff
mine sucks off the line it doesnt really pick up until 35 or so.
i think the biggest you should go on a N/A motor would be 3" unless you go duals then id go down to 2.5". if that makes sense. turboed mmmm 4"-5"
Is that with TM removed?
Old 07-12-2009 | 12:46 PM
  #23  
iamkeniff's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,365
Likes: 3
From: Gonzales, la
Default

dunno. it was tuned the way the guy wanted to do it. im in the process of retuning just works keeping me away from the tuning session. if i dont like the new tune ill just buy the blackbear tune that way i know its done right and i know id love the tune

Last edited by iamkeniff; 07-12-2009 at 12:58 PM.
Old 07-13-2009 | 10:22 AM
  #24  
BLACKND's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,123
Likes: 0
From: Alvin,TX
Default

I don't necessarily buy into the whole backpressure thing. I don't believe that the newer engines need near as much backpressure as older one, however you do IMO need to try and keep the exhaust velocity as high as possible. Thats why you hear so much about headers scavengine ability.

That being said, your exhaust doesn't sound over the top at all IMO. You may be able to benefit a little on the low end by adding some high flow cats and/or a little more restrictive muffler, however, you will be taking it away from another part of the power band. You may also benefit from going down to a 2.5 inch exhaust. But being a NNBS owner myself, my 4.8 RCSB is a dog off the line. I'm running stock manifold and cats, with SLP loudmouth 3" all the way dumped, and I felt a bit of power loss of the line too, been thinking about going with a magnaflow or something that has some type of restriction, the SLP is just an open tube.

I think you'd benefit most from a 2600-3000 torque converter or something.

Spoolin, yes even with the TM on the NNBS trucks turned off, they still suck off the line. In 07 they went to a computer controlled Throttle control, and to my knowledge it cannot be changed by the tuner, it slowly opens the TB blade. I've got all my TM off on my 4.8, which isnt a power house by any means, but still it should hit alot harder than it does. Anything other than a dead stop - start and it runs extremely well.
Old 07-13-2009 | 01:07 PM
  #25  
Spoolin's Avatar
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,870
Likes: 4
From: Here and sometimes there too.
Default

Didn't know that...kinda sucks!
Old 07-13-2009 | 04:09 PM
  #26  
BlueSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: Mission Tx
Default

Originally Posted by L33Z71
Spoolin, yes even with the TM on the NNBS trucks turned off, they still suck off the line. In 07 they went to a computer controlled Throttle control, and to my knowledge it cannot be changed by the tuner, it slowly opens the TB blade. I've got all my TM off on my 4.8, which isnt a power house by any means, but still it should hit alot harder than it does. Anything other than a dead stop - start and it runs extremely well.
There actually is a way to fix that with HP Tuners but on the nnbs the opening rate is already set to 100%. There is however a tip-in torque management that can be deactivated but you need a beta version of hp tuners. Mine has all this removed and even like that it doesn't launch very hard.
Old 07-14-2009 | 06:11 PM
  #27  
fast84's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
From: Lake Village,AR
Default

Mine is still sluggish off the line also even with mods. Guess it's just the nature of the beast.
Old 07-14-2009 | 06:14 PM
  #28  
RXDawg's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Default

plz don't take this as a dumb question guy, but all this back pressure has got me wondering how exactly the h pipes exactly work. you know equalizing the pressure on both sides of the motor to make it run better. fill me in spoolin if you think the h-pipe is worth the hype or not?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LSX-81-SIERRA
FORCED INDUCTION
3
10-02-2015 07:05 AM
carid
Sponsor's Announcements, Sales, and Specials
0
10-01-2015 09:22 AM
redbird555
GM Parts Classifieds
2
09-30-2015 09:28 AM
Rockrz
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
4
09-29-2015 09:07 AM
trevorh1
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
4
09-27-2015 08:47 PM



Quick Reply: Low, almost no backpressure



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:38 AM.