GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion 2007 - 2013 Trucks | General Discussion

LS9 cam ftw!!AGAIN

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-11-2013 | 08:10 PM
  #1  
OrangeChevyII's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Default LS9 cam ftw!!AGAIN

Pacesetter Longtubes,3" y-Pipe with third cat still present, magnaflow muffler, k/n cai and milled the stock heads .25 thousandths...tuned by Sam Miller. Need I say more? Stock with a tune they make 355-365....414 rwhp 406 tq SAE dyno pulls under 2g rpm.

Name:  1363049897_zps049881db.jpg
Views: 451
Size:  94.0 KB
Old 03-11-2013 | 09:12 PM
  #2  
skeet's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,157
Likes: 2
From: P.A. TX
Default

yup i got the same plan nice turn out
Old 03-16-2013 | 12:10 PM
  #3  
OrangeChevyII's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Default

I figured when I posted this area22 was gonna have some kind of input why the Ls9 Cam doesn't work.


Here kitty kitty kitty
Old 03-16-2013 | 06:15 PM
  #4  
iamkeniff's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,365
Likes: 3
From: Gonzales, la
Default

area22? i assume you mean area47

like i said in your other thread....what did it run bc those numbers should be in my e.t and mph range with ease. yet like you continue to do....beat around the question and never answer it other than "lets race"
Old 03-16-2013 | 06:25 PM
  #5  
DTHPROOF's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
From: Havelock, New Bern, Newport, NC
Default

That's AWESOME for a stealthy little setup!
Old 03-17-2013 | 02:10 AM
  #6  
OrangeChevyII's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Default

I went that fast in my CC with 3.42's.....397 rwhp.
Old 03-17-2013 | 05:35 AM
  #7  
iamkeniff's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,365
Likes: 3
From: Gonzales, la
Default

so prove it and post your time slip....stop beating around the question in your other thread.

Originally Posted by OrangeChevyII
I went that fast in my CC with 3.42's.....397 rwhp.
plus i went that fast in a full weight CC on 20s with a tool box and other **** with only 390rwhp according to the dyno
see what i did there...proved that the dyno isnt always right.

Last edited by iamkeniff; 03-17-2013 at 05:47 AM.
Old 03-18-2013 | 11:18 AM
  #8  
OrangeChevyII's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Default

I went to the track again this weekend, had a blast.
Old 03-18-2013 | 12:47 PM
  #9  
Area47's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 0
From: K.C.
Default

as i have said before. i went faster with less power {fbo, stock cam} made more power without milling the heads.

your argument is invalid.

i have waffles.
Old 03-18-2013 | 02:06 PM
  #10  
sprayedenali's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,573
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
Default

do none of you realize that dyno numbers are pretty much meaningless??

yes, a dyno is a great tool for comparing setups and changes, but you cant ever put two dynos in two loactions and two different times up to each other, it means essentially nothing


Quick Reply: LS9 cam ftw!!AGAIN



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 AM.