JCunningham

iTrader: (4)

The Magnuson MP1900 or the Edelbrock Eforce. The magnuson is $5800 vs the eforce $6600 what makes it worth $800 more this is for my 12 6.2L



not this again

chevyboy.520

iTrader: (6)

Do a whipple 4.0 or a big Kennebell. But if you were to pick between a tvs2300 or eforce. I'd go with the tvs2300 it's reliable and proven to make power and tons of torque.

ltr450ryder

iTrader: (13)

You also can go for a 2.9 whipple

Boober

My understanding is that the eforce is a TVS2300, so you're getting the larger TVS unit with the eforce. A better direct comparison would be with a Magnuson 2300 kit. IMHO, $6,600 isnt a bad price for the eforce kit. I think that the Maggie 2300 kit was a little more the last time I checked. I went with the Whipple because I could get the kit for about the same price as the 1900 but the base Whipple is 2.3L.

01WS6/tamu

iTrader: (36)

Where are you finding prices for the above units at. May go FI on mine shortly.

Boober

Check the site sponsors.

Robert91RS

iTrader: (2)

When the E-force2300 came out for the Camaro it was directly compared to the Maggie2300. The E-force lower intake has long runners that gave a slightly higher tq down low but the Maggie made more boost at higher rpm.

NKPPhil

So I guess the choice is partly whether you want a little more lively all-around kick in the pants in a DD, or a better *****-out drag racer. Interesting.

03sierraslt

iTrader: (22)

I wouldnt take it to that extent, very minimal differance. Personally I like the look of the Maggie much better, to me the e-force is goofy looking. These however are my opinions and don't mean much. Take them with a grain of salt.

JCunningham

iTrader: (4)

All i want is a reliable daily driver. The Maggie claims 120hp/120ftlbs at the rear wheels. The eforce claims 109hp/129ftlbs estimated at the crank to inflate numbers the Maggie is 6lbs of boost eforce does not say I want a complete bolt on kit that does not need any permanent mods to the truck.