GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion 2007 - 2013 Trucks | General Discussion

Porting the intake manifold on 6.2L/L92

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-20-2010 | 11:28 AM
  #21  
markislive78's Avatar
Thread Starter
13 Second Truck Club
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
From: Cajun Country...Lafayette, LA
Default

Originally Posted by cam
No worries man im the one whos always worried like im coming off as as an asshat its tricky when all we see are typed out words instead of a face to face gab about it. I dont often get into discrepancies in the real world but I sure seem to catch some folks ire online thats for sure haha. Been working around the clock too so Im fubar these days. Anyways its all good we're all after the same thing

Horse Power!

So back on track here I read that post and it does make sense but someone did swap an LS3 intake onto an L92 and posted dyno charts somewhere and iirc the LS3 intake didnt lose any bottom end at all but it did gain up top. I cant find the link now of course or i would have posted it last night but I found it when I was buying parts for my L92. Anyways if funds permit i'd just get that monstrous truck FAST truck intake I wasnt even aware that it existed until this thread to be honest
Yep, in the end we are all just trying to get faster : )

FYI, the current FAST truck intake is for the 5.3's and older 6.0's...I "hear" they are comming out with a truck manifold L92 heads...

Last edited by markislive78; 04-20-2010 at 11:33 AM.
Old 11-12-2010 | 07:00 PM
  #22  
1blownss's Avatar
Teching In
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: indianapolis
Default

I realize this thread is about 6 months old but it is a worthy subject for me to post in... I have a AWD TBSS that had the truck intake on it and I drove it around for about 6 weeks or so .... I put it on a dyno and got 446 AWHP and 454 AWTQ ...we then switched over to a Lingenfelter LS3 P&P intake manifold off of a new vette with only 124 miles on it , we slapped it on the same day and the new #'s were 466 AWHP & 473 AWTQ. I do realize that the longer runners in the truck intake are supposed to get the 5000 lb brick off the line quicker but most guy's are running 3600 vigs or 3600 yanks so there really is not any reason to worry about torque down real low , the vig or yank will get you to that sweet spot.

My best 1/4 mile time is to date 12.27@112 with a 1000 to 1500 foot DA and all full weight . I did spin all 4 tires for about 5-10 feet but with a little better traction I should hit the 11's with some sealevel DA.
Old 11-12-2010 | 07:20 PM
  #23  
chevrolade's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
From: pearsall.tx
Default

i hope they release a FAST l92 truck version intake
Old 11-12-2010 | 07:20 PM
  #24  
iamkeniff's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,365
Likes: 3
From: Gonzales, la
Default

sob! i want to go with a better intake, but i want to run the 102mm though if i buy a better intake. im going with the car intake i think. my cam really pulls hard up top, i just need a tighter converter or better gears.
Old 11-12-2010 | 07:31 PM
  #25  
chevrolade's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
From: pearsall.tx
Default

were in the same boat^^ lol...ill be gettin a 4400 stall soon to raplace my 3200...and im waiting on a reply from comp FAST on the 102 l92T intake
Old 11-12-2010 | 07:44 PM
  #26  
iamkeniff's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,365
Likes: 3
From: Gonzales, la
Default

ill stick with my 3600, and i actually may have it rebuilt to a triple disc
Old 11-12-2010 | 07:46 PM
  #27  
skeet's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,157
Likes: 2
From: P.A. TX
Default

Originally Posted by iamkeniff
sob! i want to go with a better intake, but i want to run the 102mm though if i buy a better intake. im going with the car intake i think. my cam really pulls hard up top, i just need a tighter converter or better gears.

the intake will raise the power band unless you go with a torque'r cam, so the stall will work well for you if you go intake route, gears? hahaha didnt you just put those gears in? guess you'll need 4:56s

Originally Posted by chevrolade
were in the same boat^^ lol...ill be gettin a 4400 stall soon to raplace my 3200...and im waiting on a reply from comp FAST on the 102 l92T intake
how soon you looking for one? is that 3200 a triple disc and can be restalled?
Old 11-12-2010 | 07:49 PM
  #28  
iamkeniff's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,365
Likes: 3
From: Gonzales, la
Default

Originally Posted by skeet
the intake will raise the power band unless you go with a torque'r cam, so the stall will work well for you if you go intake route, gears? hahaha didnt you just put those gears in? guess you'll need 4:56s

how soon you looking for one? is that 3200 a triple disc and can be restalled?
i think his is a circle d 3200 and it cant go any bigger. its a 278mm


yeah i just put them in....just means i may need 4:30s-4:56s its not a track queen but the 102mm would be awsome on the street with 4:10s...
Old 11-12-2010 | 07:56 PM
  #29  
skeet's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,157
Likes: 2
From: P.A. TX
Default

Originally Posted by iamkeniff
sob! i want to go with a better intake, but i want to run the 102mm though if i buy a better intake. im going with the car intake i think. my cam really pulls hard up top, i just need a tighter converter or better gears.
Originally Posted by chevrolade
were in the same boat^^ lol...ill be gettin a 4400 stall soon to raplace my 3200...and im waiting on a reply from comp FAST on the 102 l92T intake
Originally Posted by iamkeniff
i think his is a circle d 3200 and it cant go any bigger. its a 278mm


yeah i just put them in....just means i may need 4:30s-4:56s its not a track queen but the 102mm would be awsome on the street with 4:10s...
only one thing to do, that is try it you might like it, personally you'll be fine with the 4:10s specially on a little dope
Old 11-12-2010 | 08:37 PM
  #30  
Area47's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 0
From: K.C.
Default

interesting. may think about this at a later date


Quick Reply: Porting the intake manifold on 6.2L/L92



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:21 AM.