Track results K&N CAI
02-13-2012, 04:07 PM
#12
I'd be more than willing to hear why you think that. 
There was nothing in my post to even be inflated or unreliable. You killed your point, right off the bat. You came into this thread to state that track times were useless, which the OP never stated they were useful. You came into this thread to state that the times posted couldn't justify buying a K&N, which the OP never stated that the time "gain" did. Then, you make all that on the assumption of the times themselves, which you said were useless to begin with.? I'm willing to bet that no one cares for the ignorant *** comments that add not one thing to the conversation at hand. But hey, I remember the days when I was a hardass on the internet, full of negativity in every post that I threw up on a thread--wait, no I don't.
Dipshit.
There was nothing in my post to even be inflated or unreliable. You killed your point, right off the bat. You came into this thread to state that track times were useless, which the OP never stated they were useful. You came into this thread to state that the times posted couldn't justify buying a K&N, which the OP never stated that the time "gain" did. Then, you make all that on the assumption of the times themselves, which you said were useless to begin with.? I'm willing to bet that no one cares for the ignorant *** comments that add not one thing to the conversation at hand. But hey, I remember the days when I was a hardass on the internet, full of negativity in every post that I threw up on a thread--wait, no I don't.
Dipshit.
02-13-2012, 07:54 PM
#13
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: McAlester, OK
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd be more than willing to hear why you think that.
There was nothing in my post to even be inflated or unreliable. You killed your point, right off the bat. You came into this thread to state that track times were useless, which the OP never stated they were useful. You came into this thread to state that the times posted couldn't justify buying a K&N, which the OP never stated that the time "gain" did. Then, you make all that on the assumption of the times themselves, which you said were useless to begin with.? I'm willing to bet that no one cares for the ignorant *** comments that add not one thing to the conversation at hand. But hey, I remember the days when I was a hardass on the internet, full of negativity in every post that I threw up on a thread--wait, no I don't. Dipshit.
There was nothing in my post to even be inflated or unreliable. You killed your point, right off the bat. You came into this thread to state that track times were useless, which the OP never stated they were useful. You came into this thread to state that the times posted couldn't justify buying a K&N, which the OP never stated that the time "gain" did. Then, you make all that on the assumption of the times themselves, which you said were useless to begin with.? I'm willing to bet that no one cares for the ignorant *** comments that add not one thing to the conversation at hand. But hey, I remember the days when I was a hardass on the internet, full of negativity in every post that I threw up on a thread--wait, no I don't.
Dipshit.I'm not trying to be a hardass on the internet. I'm pointing out the mistakes that members on this forum make. Want to know why there aren't any FAST people here that call this their home forum? Because the only thing THIS forum is good for is the classifieds.
02-13-2012, 08:05 PM
#14
There's a world's difference in unreliable data, as compared to an unreliable comparison. Think what you may on that one, but the guy posted his results. He likes his intake--great. Does a forum really need "FAST" people to be an efficient forum, though? I don't get it. There are some of the fastest street-trim trucks in the nation on this site and drag trucks on here that are setting class records. I mean, it IS a truck forum. I don't know what your classification of "FAST" is, but I'm pretty impressed with some of these trucks--I don't exactly expect John Force to be a contributing member. I thought it was all in what made members happy.? But, I mean if it really comes down to all that nonsense, I'm willing to bet heavily that my rig is faster than yours. Guess I'm a better member. Just saying, bud. 
02-13-2012, 10:34 PM
#16
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Crosby,Tx.
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is true. The information I posted does prove it. .02 on the time slip and .08 in weather conditions. That equals a tenth. You may not spend enough time around the track to understand how weather affects track times, but I posted all the info to prove it.
02-13-2012, 10:53 PM
#18
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Crosby,Tx.
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unreliable would be due to the lack in MPH and 60' and still defining it as a determinate amount of a gain. Unless runs are made back to back on the same day, same DA, same wind, same weather, they're useless. Who's to say it isn't good for .3? Or a loss of .1?
I'm not trying to be a hardass on the internet. I'm pointing out the mistakes that members on this forum make. Want to know why there aren't any FAST people here that call this their home forum? Because the only thing THIS forum is good for is the classifieds.
I'm not trying to be a hardass on the internet. I'm pointing out the mistakes that members on this forum make. Want to know why there aren't any FAST people here that call this their home forum? Because the only thing THIS forum is good for is the classifieds.