06' 5.3l with AFR 205's cam question?
#11
13 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (1)
Cool, I will have to look into the converter. Do you know if the tq multiplication is up there with Yank and Vig?
Playing phone tag with Futral they put 2-4* of advance into thier cams. I will have to corner some one over there tomorrow and get a good answer from them on what they think.
I also played with my compression ratio calculator and can get it up to 10.05:1 if I use a .040 Cometic and the 59cc's. That should help me make up some of the lost dynamic compression. Advancing the cam should do a little bit as well. It seems that I will be limited to 5,500rpm with the stock intake so getting as much bottom end as I can will be good.
Playing phone tag with Futral they put 2-4* of advance into thier cams. I will have to corner some one over there tomorrow and get a good answer from them on what they think.
I also played with my compression ratio calculator and can get it up to 10.05:1 if I use a .040 Cometic and the 59cc's. That should help me make up some of the lost dynamic compression. Advancing the cam should do a little bit as well. It seems that I will be limited to 5,500rpm with the stock intake so getting as much bottom end as I can will be good.
#12
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have had these exact heads on three different cars and four different motors with out an issue with intake fitment. I have run them with stock LS1/6 and FAST 90/92's ported and unported. It takes about .050" for 7cc's plus the .010" for the gasket. .060" is negligable. It probably wouldn't even be worth the port match. Now if you angle milled you would have problems.
That is interesting about your intake. Those RPM numbers are backed up on the dyno? I was hearing that if I wanted to get any RPM out of this thing I needed to get the Trail Blazer SS intake system at a minimum if not the FAST intake.
That is interesting about your intake. Those RPM numbers are backed up on the dyno? I was hearing that if I wanted to get any RPM out of this thing I needed to get the Trail Blazer SS intake system at a minimum if not the FAST intake.
#13
13 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (1)
Yeah they are backed by dyno numbers, although the power numbers themselves are probably are a bit inflated, the rpm where the peaks are at would still be accurate.
Horsepower is the red line an the numbers are on the LEFT. Torque is the blue line and the numbers are on the RIGHT.
Here's a vid too:
[URL=http://s832.photobucket.com/albums/zz248/LS1FREEK/Dyno/?action=view¤t=DSCF4116.flv[/URL]
Horsepower is the red line an the numbers are on the LEFT. Torque is the blue line and the numbers are on the RIGHT.
Here's a vid too:
[URL=http://s832.photobucket.com/albums/zz248/LS1FREEK/Dyno/?action=view¤t=DSCF4116.flv[/URL]
#14
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dude that is awsome on a MD. My 500rw motor only put down 470rw on an AWMD. That is sick power out of a cam, headers 5.3. I was hoping to see those kind of numbers out of mine on a DJ with the heads. It only put down 260/280rw on a DJ as it sits. I was thinking I could get 100+rw out of the heads, cam, headers. I did get 110rw out of lesser heads and smaller cam on a guys A4 Vette. We will see. But now I know it is going to take alot of power to get this thing into the 12's@115 or so. The end goal is 10's@125 at least.
Thanks for your posts guys. I have gained alot of knowlege from them.
P.S. Can you guys tell me about the Corvette Servo?
Thanks for your posts guys. I have gained alot of knowlege from them.
P.S. Can you guys tell me about the Corvette Servo?
#15
13 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (1)
Like i said, i think my numbers might be inflated. Personally i think it was closer to 340 to 350. But along the lines of the vette servo, its a must have. You can get one on ebay for less than 20 bucks. It will firm up the 1st to 2nd shift quite a bit and even helps the 2nd to 3rd shift as well. Basicly, it will just have more holding power in 2nd gear.
#16
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Right on. Should I invest in a Transgo shift kit as well. I have rebuilt four 700-R4's but no 4l60's. I would guess they would be about the same except for the electronics. I am sure a full rebuild is down the road.
#19
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I ran Tony's cam on my stock LS6 with headers and made 700rw at 13lbs out of a P1 so I know the cam makes power.
I think I am going to advance the cam a couple of degrees, bump the compression up to 10:1 and get the converter discussed earlier for the N/A configuration. The truck will never be a drag hero but it will be a whole lot more livable.
I think I am going to advance the cam a couple of degrees, bump the compression up to 10:1 and get the converter discussed earlier for the N/A configuration. The truck will never be a drag hero but it will be a whole lot more livable.
#20
TECH Veteran
Assuming you have an L33 the 224/230 with a 3000 stall would run just fine with it being on a 114LSA. It wouldn't be an ideal cam, but would run just fine. I've done a couple of 5.3L's with 224/230's and neither were a turd down low, both just needed a stall. The heads and compression will be what really helps you out.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
5.3lSilverado
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
25
08-29-2016 12:48 AM