208/230 cam
08-14-2009, 06:31 AM
#11
I dont know man. First glance I say hell no, especially with that LSA...but I am running a reverse split cam which everyone advised against...and I love it.
I think if you are running a stock exhaust system you might retain a enough back pressure to keep some of your TQ, and up top the HP will increase. I say try it, but then again, its not my money.
I think if you are running a stock exhaust system you might retain a enough back pressure to keep some of your TQ, and up top the HP will increase. I say try it, but then again, its not my money.
08-14-2009, 09:40 AM
#12
TECH Resident
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: bakersfield, ca
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.lingenfelter.com/mm5/merc...egory_Code=C31
its an lpe gt7, designed for f.i.. i wouldnt use it n.a. for sure.
its an lpe gt7, designed for f.i.. i wouldnt use it n.a. for sure.
08-14-2009, 01:28 PM
#14
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 4,665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Go with something a little more suited for your needs instead of skimping out. Get a nice 214/218 grind or even a 220r on a 112 you have the cubes and heads for a nice size cam like a 224/224 or even a 224/228 in the mid 570 lift range.
08-14-2009, 05:07 PM
#15
It does. I had also heard that the L92 heads liked quicker valve events on the intake side even with NA. I acquired the cam in a package deal with FI in mind, but changed my mind(again!). Thought it might still work. Looks like I need to call WCCH. Heard nothing but good things.
Jay
Jay
(from what I've heard)
Last edited by LMSeven; 08-14-2009 at 05:22 PM.
08-14-2009, 06:13 PM
#16
TECH Junkie
Yeah its a GT7. Almost exactly the same specs as an LS7 cam but they don't interchange btw. Performance is good, and gas mileage and idle are great but there are a lot better na cams for sure. Then again, if you go fi in the future...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
