INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

212/218 hi lift in a stock 5.3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-19-2009, 11:36 AM
  #1  
no title here
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
skyhighsami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 2,352
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default 212/218 hi lift in a stock 5.3

I have a 5.3 in my wife's Yukon. I am building an iron LS2 for it. I have a 212/218 high light cam that I was going to put in a LS1 with some TEA Stage 1.5 heads that I am swapping in my Samurai. Anyway, I was curious how that cam would work in the 5.3 while I am waiting for the LS2 to be done and the rest of the parts to get here for the LS1. I would need some LS6 springs, but would be using the stock stall now and manifolds unless I find some headers soon. Would the cam swap net enough extra power to be worthwhile? Or would it be better to throw on the TEA heads even though they have a 59cc chamber? The only reason I am looking at this is because Stacey's truck is a slug off the line and down shifts a lot on the interstate at speed. It has a Vengeance Tune, Magnaflow muffler and 3.73 gears stock.
Old 08-19-2009, 12:17 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (26)
 
slowlsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Deer park
Posts: 1,892
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

that sounds like a good low range cam, so i would say throw it in there!my buddy has a 220-220 and it makes good power downlow evan with a stock stall so i would think that 212/218 would make better power downlow... good luck!
Old 08-19-2009, 12:43 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
03 BLACKOUTSSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North of Detroit
Posts: 1,331
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

High lift = more than LS6 springs...what kind of lift are you talking? Highest ive seen on LS6s is around .560"
Old 08-19-2009, 01:22 PM
  #4  
11 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (5)
 
MPFD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yeah I think you gonna want more spring to be on the safe side. I'm running ls6 yellows on my 212/218 but its the old low lift version.
Old 08-19-2009, 03:54 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
Coban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 2,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

High lift is .558"/.563"

I have this cam in my stock stalled 5.3 ext cab with 3.23s. It isn't that quick off the line. It was a blast when I had 4.10s although I have never gotten the tires to squeal on takeoff.

It DOES pull strong to 6300 where I shift at. I didn't really notice a difference in low end with the cam, so I'm not going to say it would help in that department. I'd kinda like to try the low lift version just for comparison's sake.

My next motor will be a LQ9 with 243 heads and I'm wanting to reuse this cam. Should make for good low end in that motor and still enable it to breathe.
Old 08-19-2009, 04:09 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 12,275
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Coban
I have never gotten the tires to squeal on takeoff.
This is pathetic. My condolences and I hope you get that 6.0 sooner than later
Old 08-19-2009, 06:21 PM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
Coban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 2,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GMCtrk
This is pathetic. My condolences and I hope you get that 6.0 sooner than later

Hey now, at least they squeal when the turbo spools up.

There is something to be said about the sheer torque of a larger motor. Hopefully high compression will make it even better.

FI just complicates things, I had my fun.

And I don't believe in aftermarket TCs.
Old 08-20-2009, 12:38 PM
  #8  
11 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (5)
 
MPFD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Coban
And I don't believe in aftermarket TCs.
Like that they exist, or just not gonna spend the money?

If I knew then what I know now, a Yank would have been my second mod, behind spray. I mean maybe even before the "free" mods cause most of those are all BS anyway. I would definatly would not do a cam before a converter again! My 3600 dropped a full second off my E.T.!

Last edited by MPFD; 08-20-2009 at 01:09 PM.
Old 08-20-2009, 02:39 PM
  #9  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
Coban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 2,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MPFD
Like that they exist, or just not gonna spend the money?
No no, I believe they exist. I just don't believe in using them as a quick fix for an awful bottom end. I'm looking for torque now.

Also, I don't like the added stress they create.
Also, I would rather have as many OEM parts as possible.
Also, I'm not building an all out race truck. I just like to have fun while in cruising around.

To each their own.
Old 08-20-2009, 02:51 PM
  #10  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
AdioSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Texas 75707
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Coban, did/do you run that cam in a naturally aspirated combo?


Quick Reply: 212/218 hi lift in a stock 5.3



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:29 PM.