220/220 vs 228/228 on my setup?
08-27-2009, 03:57 PM
#21
11 Second Truck Club
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Palmview Tx. "RGV"
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
0? as in a dead stop better yet at the tree??
how does what respond from 0?? cam/converter... if so...then great... given me a best of 1.62 60ft...cam pulls harder uptop rather then down low... i love it.. but since i've modded it some more... that 228/228 is coming out, going another route.
how does what respond from 0?? cam/converter... if so...then great... given me a best of 1.62 60ft...cam pulls harder uptop rather then down low... i love it.. but since i've modded it some more... that 228/228 is coming out, going another route.
Go with the 220, can't go wrong with it... That's a proven cam on 5.3"
08-28-2009, 06:04 PM
#25
I have tried out 3 cams this year and every time I keep going smaller and the power and ET's stay almost the same but with better drivability. Cams I tested were 239 251 112 lsa, 235 239 110 lsa, and 226 230 114 lsa and ET's on the first 2 were almost identical for all motor. I would take the 220 220 over the bigger cams in your set-up.
Last edited by tarinitup; 08-28-2009 at 06:05 PM. Reason: spelling
08-29-2009, 03:32 PM
#26
On The Tree
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Weslaco, TX
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It was on the juice... I've increased compression on my 5.3 so therefore m getting rid of the 228 n going another route... Amadeos best 60ft. On his 5.3 on a 150 Was a best of 1.6x when he hit that 11.2..
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BROKE-aSS-BLAZER
GM Parts Classifieds
7
10-13-2017 03:50 PM
GMCtrk
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
18
10-06-2015 03:48 PM
