INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

4.8/5.3 block questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-10-2006 | 04:20 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: Panama City, Fl
Default 4.8/5.3 block questions

Ok guys, got another question for ya. So I've heard you can bore the 5.3 out to a 5.7 and everything be ok. Can you do the same with the 4.8 block? The 4.8 and 5.3 have the same bore so I would assume it's the same block just a different crank (3.27 stroke). If this is the case you should be able to swap in a 5.7 or 5.3 or what have you crankshaft correct? I might even leave the 4.8 crank and just go with bigger pistons for a quick/high revving 312ci FI motor. Just some ideas I'm thrwoing around. The smaller displacment should make more HP on the turbo up top but loses low end torque from my calculations. Should be maxxing out around 6500rpm in the HP.
Old 10-10-2006 | 04:28 PM
  #2  
CHEVRACER83's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,023
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere around -199C
Default

sounds like a really hot combo..... might not be too good for a heavy truck, but in a f or y body would probably be a killer setup.

how close is this idea to being attempted? or are you just thinking out loud?
Old 10-10-2006 | 06:19 PM
  #3  
ShaneSmith's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Jonesboro, AR
Default

i remember something on here saying the 4.8 and 5.3 block are the same and that if you look on the back of to block it says. 4.8/5.3 block.
Old 10-10-2006 | 06:39 PM
  #4  
moregrip's Avatar
what a rush!
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,611
Likes: 28
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

I like that short stroke idea!
Old 10-10-2006 | 06:56 PM
  #5  
vanillagorilla's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 0
From: Arizona Bay
Default

You can also take it out to a 3.905" bore and stick a 4" crank in it. You'd have a small bore 383.

The short stroke high reving idea is cool, but if you have the opportunity, put a longer stroke in it. With how cheap LS1/5.3/6.0 cranks are these days you'd be foolish to stick with a 3.27" crank in a truck. Trust me I know.
Old 10-10-2006 | 10:06 PM
  #6  
Keith's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 0
From: Mefis
Default

Piston speed with the 3.622" stroke is not too bad. I'd go with it. But why not use your crank and the 4.8 rods too.

Some forged aftermarket pistons and good rod bolts will take you far.
Old 10-10-2006 | 10:50 PM
  #7  
Blown02Sierra's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: Vegas
Default

the 5.3 rotating assembly would make that into a 5.3, so yes, you could bore your block to whatever makes a 5.3 a 5.7, and use a crank even larger than that of the 5.3 and w/ a little clearancing could get a lot more cubes out of it. I'd like to see a buildup like that. From my theories in my head i believe that the more stroke, the more torque. correct me if im wrong.
Old 10-11-2006 | 12:16 AM
  #8  
kbracing96's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,485
Likes: 30
From: Oakland, OR
Default

Originally Posted by vanillagorilla
You can also take it out to a 3.905" bore and stick a 4" crank in it. You'd have a small bore 383.

The short stroke high reving idea is cool, but if you have the opportunity, put a longer stroke in it. With how cheap LS1/5.3/6.0 cranks are these days you'd be foolish to stick with a 3.27" crank in a truck. Trust me I know.
I agree, these trucks are to heavy to give up the low end torque you would get with a longer stroke.
Old 10-11-2006 | 07:54 PM
  #9  
v8bug's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Default

I think you would still need custom pistons to keep the 4.8 crank. Correct me if I am wrong, but I think the 4.8 has a different length rod and the different location of the wrist pin on the piston. So if you bored to 5.7 and bought cheap forged pistons the rods would be wrong.?
Old 10-13-2006 | 03:05 PM
  #10  
Keith's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 0
From: Mefis
Default

Not if the rods and stroke were matched. I believe the compression height is like 1.31" or something like that. 9.24" dech height minus 6.275" rods minus half the stroke (3.26/2)1.63 equals: 1.335 which would put the piston .0025 in the hole at zero deck.
could use these pistons:http://www.sdpc2000.com/catalog/4135...e-6125-Rod.htm



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 AM.