4.8 big cam.
#1
4.8 big cam.
Hello everyone,
I previously had a RCSB with a 4.8 and went with a chopacabra cam and that was purely for CHOP!. Welll long story short I have another truck (RCLB 4.8) and wanted to know if the Hawks Sinister cam is too crazy of a cam for a 4.8 it is a car cam (ls1) at the end of the day. Specs are 230/236 .600"/.600" 112+4 LSA. I plan on keeping the SBE, & hand porting & decking the heads.
I previously had a RCSB with a 4.8 and went with a chopacabra cam and that was purely for CHOP!. Welll long story short I have another truck (RCLB 4.8) and wanted to know if the Hawks Sinister cam is too crazy of a cam for a 4.8 it is a car cam (ls1) at the end of the day. Specs are 230/236 .600"/.600" 112+4 LSA. I plan on keeping the SBE, & hand porting & decking the heads.
#2
If your gears are LOW enough, and your stall is HIGH enough, the short stroke mouse motor will be plenty happy.
My wild-as guesstimate says the 4.8 with 230/236 is crying for 4.56 gears and 3600+ stall
My wild-as guesstimate says the 4.8 with 230/236 is crying for 4.56 gears and 3600+ stall
#3
If you plan on 11:1+ compression, 4.56 gears and 4500 stall, then sure go for it. Still pointless though unless you're running nitrous or boost. It's pretty proven that around 220* intake is max needed to squeeze all the power you'll get out of a 4.8L N/A. Basically you're just killing driveability and both low/midrange torque, with zero benefit in peak power.
For example, Summit's SUM-8720R1 218/227 .600/.600" 112+2 made same power as a whole host of much larger camshafts in a 4.8L. (Note: Ignore the title, all testing is without boost).
For example, Summit's SUM-8720R1 218/227 .600/.600" 112+2 made same power as a whole host of much larger camshafts in a 4.8L. (Note: Ignore the title, all testing is without boost).
Last edited by 68Formula; Yesterday at 12:29 PM.
#4
makes children cry
iTrader: (5)
^^ echoing the above: will it run? sure. is it overkill? probably.
case-in-point: my builder, with concurrence from BTR, recommended a 231/248 cam for my little LS1 (originally speced for a high-effort 6.2). what saves its drivability in my car is its wide LSA (120°+5) maintaining compression... that and pushing 13psi through it.
even then, there was a marked decrease in sub-2500rpm torque (even in my little 3400lb car), but it carries through to 7000 now instead of falling off above 5500.
case-in-point: my builder, with concurrence from BTR, recommended a 231/248 cam for my little LS1 (originally speced for a high-effort 6.2). what saves its drivability in my car is its wide LSA (120°+5) maintaining compression... that and pushing 13psi through it.
The following users liked this post:
Yon2xx (Yesterday)
#5
makes children cry
iTrader: (5)
oh yeah... and you'll need to do dynamic compression calculations to see how much more static compression bump you'll need to maintain cylinder pressure.
going from stock 853s (10.1:1 SCR) & 2000 LS1 cam to the bump stick above with ported 243s (10.6:1 SCR), i've still got slightly lower cylinder pressure now despite pushing 2psi more boost.
going from stock 853s (10.1:1 SCR) & 2000 LS1 cam to the bump stick above with ported 243s (10.6:1 SCR), i've still got slightly lower cylinder pressure now despite pushing 2psi more boost.
The following users liked this post:
Yon2xx (Yesterday)
The following users liked this post:
Yon2xx (Yesterday)
#8
TECH Fanatic
Or instant boost from a supercharger.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
03_SILVERADO_SLO
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
1
07-05-2006 06:59 PM