INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

4.8 crank in a 6.0L ?s.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-01-2007 | 12:08 PM
  #11  
Stampede4ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Default

I'm sorry guy's, for some reason I was thinking the 4.8 crank had more stroke, not less. That's not what I'm looking for.

Thanks.
Old 12-08-2013 | 02:28 AM
  #12  
posz71's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Carthage, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Keith
4.8L crank is 3.268"
5.3L/5.7L/6.0L crank is 3.622"

You could use the 4.8L crank, 4.8L rods and 6.0L pistons.

No y'all got it wrong u should use the 6.0 block and crank with the longer 4.8 rods. You would have to either raise the deck height or get custom pistons but u wouldn't lose torque and you would get some of the advantage a shorter stroke provides with the longer rods having a motor that could eisily turn 8000 and make power all the way through the rpm rang with the right valve train/head combo
Old 12-08-2013 | 11:33 AM
  #13  
dirty_old_chevy's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Alberta, Canada
Default

I love the concept of the large bore/short stroke, but if you want to rev it much over 7000 on a regular basis, the valve train mods are probably going to destroy your wallet.
Old 12-08-2013 | 11:38 AM
  #14  
dirty_old_chevy's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Alberta, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by posz71
No y'all got it wrong u should use the 6.0 block and crank with the longer 4.8 rods. You would have to either raise the deck height or get custom pistons but u wouldn't lose torque and you would get some of the advantage a shorter stroke provides with the longer rods having a motor that could eisily turn 8000 and make power all the way through the rpm rang with the right valve train/head combo
I do not believe they can make a piston with that short of compression height. So you are suggesting he superdeck the block just for the marginal benefit of the longer rod?
Old 12-08-2013 | 12:50 PM
  #15  
batboy's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 5
From: middle of nowhere, Kansas
Default

Originally Posted by whitt1
Destroking a 6.0 is a waste of time for a street motor.
Amen brother!

The real secret to building a high reving motor is in the valve train.
Old 12-08-2013 | 01:25 PM
  #16  
Blwn99x's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 208
Likes: 1
From: Lutz,FL (its called 'Lootz")
Default

if you were going to turbo, the high rpm would have an advantage, but the valvetrain would be all spensive haha
Old 12-08-2013 | 01:43 PM
  #17  
62nalide's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 2
From: Dallas TX
Default

If I had the funds for it Thats my dream engine a destroke 6.0 revving @8000rpms
Old 12-08-2013 | 02:12 PM
  #18  
offroadrider12's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 426
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
Default Destroked 6.0

De-stroked 6.0L LS LQ4 6.0 de-stroked to 334 C.I. on Dynometer - YouTube
Old 12-08-2013 | 02:59 PM
  #19  
batboy's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 5
From: middle of nowhere, Kansas
Default

Sorry, but I was unimpressed with that motor in the video, 540 hp at the flywheel is what? Maybe 450 at the wheels? My stock bottom end LS1 does that though a stalled auto trans.
Old 12-08-2013 | 03:32 PM
  #20  
kelsey_canard's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 959
Likes: 1
From: Arkansas
Default

Originally Posted by posz71
No y'all got it wrong u should use the 6.0 block and crank with the longer 4.8 rods. You would have to either raise the deck height or get custom pistons but u wouldn't lose torque and you would get some of the advantage a shorter stroke provides with the longer rods having a motor that could eisily turn 8000 and make power all the way through the rpm rang with the right valve train/head combo
Zombie thread revival. This thread is 7 years old



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:33 AM.