408 stroker longevity
#21
Exactly why I said I didnt do it. More wear than your 6.0 after just about 3000 miles sounds like a hell no in my opinion.
If you are willing to do whatever it takes for power, or refresh it often (you can only bore and hone a block so many times once its brought out to 4.030) then go for it. I wasnt... simple as that.
If you are willing to do whatever it takes for power, or refresh it often (you can only bore and hone a block so many times once its brought out to 4.030) then go for it. I wasnt... simple as that.
#24
Exactly why I said I didnt do it. More wear than your 6.0 after just about 3000 miles sounds like a hell no in my opinion.
If you are willing to do whatever it takes for power, or refresh it often (you can only bore and hone a block so many times once its brought out to 4.030) then go for it. I wasnt... simple as that.
If you are willing to do whatever it takes for power, or refresh it often (you can only bore and hone a block so many times once its brought out to 4.030) then go for it. I wasnt... simple as that.
pretty much every motor I have ever built I pull every season and get it looked at for peace of mind.
#25
#26
yea I have a 94 GMC Yukon wit a 6.0 LS from a 2003 Chevy Silverado and I want to build a 415-418 bored and stroked. Doing the research on it everybody say it’s a future problem waiting to happen due to the fact that the cylinder walls will be to thin for that application. So you can make the same power from a 408 that you can make from a 418 just 25 hp less which you’ll never notice on the street but you can still make 423hp on a 408cid stroker motor and it will be stronger. Also you can put a supercharger on that and build more reliable horsepower wit a 408cid then you can wit a 418cid
#27
yea I have a 94 GMC Yukon wit a 6.0 LS from a 2003 Chevy Silverado and I want to build a 415-418 bored and stroked. Doing the research on it everybody say it’s a future problem waiting to happen due to the fact that the cylinder walls will be to thin for that application. So you can make the same power from a 408 that you can make from a 418 just 25 hp less which you’ll never notice on the street but you can still make 423hp on a 408cid stroker motor and it will be stronger. Also you can put a supercharger on that and build more reliable horsepower wit a 408cid then you can wit a 418cid
I've never put a naturally aspirated 408 on the dyno but I would hope it made more than 423hp. A L76 6.0 with cam only made 410rwhp. A LQ4 or LQ9 will need to be taken from a 4" bore to a 4.070 bore and 4" stroke to make it a 416.
For a daily I wouldn't want to use a 4" crank. Majority of the stuff I build uses the stock Crankshaft and the setups get 3000-4000 miles a month put on them.
I'd go with forced induction before I went with a 4" or 4.125" Crankshaft. I know how many trouble free miles I have put on a turbo 6.0.
#28
A LS3 with cam will make 475rwhp.
I've never put a naturally aspirated 408 on the dyno but I would hope it made more than 423hp. A L76 6.0 with cam only made 410rwhp. A LQ4 or LQ9 will need to be taken from a 4" bore to a 4.070 bore and 4" stroke to make it a 416.
For a daily I wouldn't want to use a 4" crank. Majority of the stuff I build uses the stock Crankshaft and the setups get 3000-4000 miles a month put on them.
I'd go with forced induction before I went with a 4" or 4.125" Crankshaft. I know how many trouble free miles I have put on a turbo 6.0.
I've never put a naturally aspirated 408 on the dyno but I would hope it made more than 423hp. A L76 6.0 with cam only made 410rwhp. A LQ4 or LQ9 will need to be taken from a 4" bore to a 4.070 bore and 4" stroke to make it a 416.
For a daily I wouldn't want to use a 4" crank. Majority of the stuff I build uses the stock Crankshaft and the setups get 3000-4000 miles a month put on them.
I'd go with forced induction before I went with a 4" or 4.125" Crankshaft. I know how many trouble free miles I have put on a turbo 6.0.