INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

5.3 with 6.0 parts?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-16-2010 | 10:53 PM
  #1  
ccantu0389's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: Houston TX
Default 5.3 with 6.0 parts?

Is anybody running a a 5.3 with a 6.0 crank and rod? Will this work good?
Old 05-17-2010 | 12:29 PM
  #2  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
From: vancouver, WA
Default

well, the 5.3 and the 6.0 have the same stroke, so not sure why you want to swap.
(I believe the crank is the same part, but you may know more about it)
Also, the rods are the same.
Old 05-17-2010 | 01:58 PM
  #3  
Phantom's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,686
Likes: 23
From: The 405
Default

crank and rods are the same so yes it will work
Old 05-23-2010 | 12:45 PM
  #4  
acethedragon's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Default

stroke is the same, but balance is different. something to look at
Old 05-23-2010 | 02:10 PM
  #5  
MPFD's Avatar
11 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Default

Originally Posted by acethedragon
stroke is the same, but balance is different. something to look at
Please explain?
Old 05-23-2010 | 04:50 PM
  #6  
1Bear's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 8
From: Jones Creek, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by MPFD
Please explain?
The 5.3L, 5.7 & 6.0L crankshafts have the same casting number (c\n 12552216), while only the 5.7L pieces are gun-drilled. The piston weights are different enough for the 5.3L, 5.7L and 6.0L that you want to have the balance checked when swapping stock components. Also, cranks used in the engines with floating pin rods, which are way heavier, throws a little more of a kink in just swapping components. People swapped cranks between the 305’s & 350’s for years without major issues and they had vastly different piston weights as well and you can probably get away with it in your average street motor, but in a motor that you know is going to be turning higher rpm’s, it would be prudent to have the reciprocating assembly rebalanced.

Also, while it would seem that a gun drilled crank from a 5.7L would be the way to go for less reciprocating mass, it is really more in help in bay to bay breathing than anything, due to the weight being removed from the centerline of the crank and not from the out extremities, but weight is weight to a degree. Most of the aftermarket cranks will have the rod journals drilled as well as the main journals for a truly lighter package all things being equal.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Raggedz71
TOWING & OFFROAD PERFORMANCE
3
07-29-2016 10:20 AM
JordanH
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
9
08-08-2015 07:59 PM
OLD BULL
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
13
08-01-2015 05:00 PM
steves86ta
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
07-28-2015 10:21 AM
ferrellrooster
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
5
07-13-2015 09:53 AM



Quick Reply: 5.3 with 6.0 parts?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:30 PM.